Archive | Bicycles

If a Hurricane Watch is Called

ATLANTA, Sept. 3 (UPI) — U.S. health officials say people living in areas where hurricane watches are posted should plan and expect to evacuate, and never ignore evacuation orders.

Hurricane and tropical storm watches and warnings were posted Thursday evening for much of the Atlantic Coast from North Carolina to the Canadian Maritimes as Hurricane Earl churned along the coast.

The National Weather Service issues hurricane watches when there is a threat to coastal areas of hurricane conditions within 24-36 hours, a statement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says.

If a hurricane watch is issued, the CDC says to:

– Fill the automobile’s gas tank.

– If no vehicle is available, make arrangements with friends or family for transportation outside of the area.

– Fill clean water containers — 5 gallons per person per day.

– Listen to radio or watch television for weather updates as well as disaster sirens and warning.

– Prepare an emergency kit for vehicles with food, flares and other emergency gear.

– Secure or store any items outside which may cause damage property in high winds, such as bicycles, grills, propane tanks.

– Cover windows and doors with wood or place large strips of adhesive tape on the windows to reduce the risk of breakage and flying glass.

– Put livestock and family pets in a safe area. Many emergency shelters cannot accept pets.

– Adjust the thermostat on refrigerators and freezers to the coolest possible temperature.

– If you evacuate, turn off the gas, electricity and water and disconnect appliances.

Copyright 2010 United Press International, Inc. (UPI). Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI’s prior written consent.

Posted in Bicycles, Electricity, Other, Transportation0 Comments

Is the Apple iBike Coming to a Bike Shop Near You?

August 5 (EcoWorld) –┬áBased on a patent filed by Apple on Thursday, it appears the company has been working on a technology that will allow bikers to track in real time important data such as speed, distance, location, and much much more. The system would hook-up to the user’s bike, which would then communicate directly with an iPod or iPhone the biker would need to carry.

The premise of the product is similar to Apple’s “Nike + iPod” system, except is for bikers instead of runners. Additional metrics the iBike system could measure include, time, altitude, elevation, incline, decline, heart rate, power, derailleur setting, cadence, wind speed, path completed, expected future path, heart rate, power, and pace.

The iBike system (not an official name yet) could also be used with partners, allow fellow cyclists to track and share information about each other within the group. And of course, similar to the Nike + iPod system, the iBike would allow bikers to track on a map where they have been and where they plan to go. There is no official word yet from Apple on when, or even if, this product will be released.

Image credit.

Posted in Bicycles, Transportation0 Comments

Down Syndrome, Autistic Kids Ride Bikes

ANN ARBOR, Mich., July 26 (UPI) — Children with Down syndrome or autism may not master learning to ride two-wheel bikes but many who attended a U.S. university camp can ride two-wheelers.

Dale Ulrich, a professor in the University of Michigan’s School of Kinesiology in Ann Arbor and lead researcher of the project, says the camp offers five sessions a day — each with eight participants — for a total enrollment of 40 students during the week. The same children come each of the five days at the same time for the 1 hour, 15 minute session.

Ulrich says the bicycles used at the camp have graduated back wheels that start wide and get narrower as the riders learn to balance on a two-wheeler.

In past camps, conducted this summer, 80 percent of participants learned to ride the two-wheeler by the using the special bikes provided by Lose the Training Wheels, Ulrich says.

Ulrich and colleagues are tracking the children and measuring the frequency of riding; amount of time on average per day spent in sedentary, light, moderate and vigorous physical activity; social interaction skills; number of community activities they participate in and who they participate with; and sleep quality, leg strength, standing balance, body fat and waist circumference.

Copyright 2010 United Press International, Inc. (UPI). Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI’s prior written consent.

Posted in Bicycles, Other0 Comments

Jet Propulsion Laboratory Plans Open House

PASADENA, Calif., May 11 (UPI) — NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. is inviting the public to its annual open house, which will include displays from numerous space missions.

Officials said the event, to be held Saturday and Sunday 9 a.m.-5 p.m. PDT, is themed “Worlds Beyond” and will feature the JPL-built Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 that was retrieved from NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope last year by space-walking astronauts. The instrument is on loan from the National Air and Space Museum.

JPL scientists said other open house highlights will include: seeing JPL’s next spacecraft — the Mars Science Laboratory — which is under construction in the lab’s largest “clean room;” life-size rover models in a Mars test bed; and JPL’s Microdevices Lab, where engineers and scientists use tiny technology to revolutionize space exploration.

Visitors will also be able to view the sun through solar-safe telescopes, and learn how NASA instruments help scientists better understand global climate change.

Officials noted all vehicles entering NASA/JPL property are subject to inspection. Visitors are prohibited from bringing certain items onto the JPL property, including weapons, explosives, alcohol, pets, skates or skateboards and bicycles. No bags, backpacks or ice chests are allowed, except small purses and diaper bags.

Copyright 2010 United Press International, Inc. (UPI). Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI’s prior written consent.

Posted in Bicycles, Other, Solar0 Comments

Principles of New Suburbanism

The essense of New Suburbanism is to support a clean, but wider human footprint – which is anathema to much of conventional environmentalist wisdom. In many parts of the world, such as within the state of California, there is abundant open space. California, especially within its vast interior, has hundreds upon thousands of virtually vacant square miles of rolling foothills, rangeland, forests, farms and fields. The Golden State is a whopping 158,000 square miles in size, with only 36 million people, most of them already crammed quite amicably within reasonably dense urban areas. California will always have plenty of available land, and the mantra that the personal residences of humans must be consigned to ever higher densities is not natural law or indisputably moral. A wider human footprint is not necessarily anathema to the health of the environment.
post resumes below image

Low density communities can spread along roads and highways, with
small scale commercial agriculture and wildlife corridors, independent
of expensive utility scale energy, water, or information infrastructure.
(Photo: EcoWorld)

New Suburbanism, despite this emphasis on treating land as abundant, does not have to be in conflict with the ideals of New Urbanism. The roots of New Urbanism are to promote architectural and urban designs that create a sense of place in new communities; its roots are are not in environmentalism or open space movements – New Urbanism is a movement of architects and urban planners with an aesthetic focus.

For this reason, New Urbanism, at least in terms of its origins, does not necessarily require a focus on high-density development. But today, the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) promotes themselves as “the leading organization promoting walkable, neighborhood-based development as an alternative to sprawl.” Another group, NewUrbanism.org, has adopted the following eight fundamental principles:

Principles of New Urbanism“:
1 – Walkability,
2 – Connectivity,
3 – Mixed-Use & Diversity,
4 – Mixed Housing,
5 – Quality Architecture & Urban Design,
6 – Traditional Neighborhood Structure,
7 – Increased Density, and
8 – Smart Transportation.

New Urbanism today promotes ultra high density human habitation as an accepted priority. As New Suburbanists, we would claim this bias is often counterproductively applied. We believe NewUrbanism.org’s, principle #6, increased density, is being given excessive weight by New Urbanists. Their principle #7, smart transportation, in practice means mandating light rail and/or streetcars, and ultra high-density housing concentrated along these corridors. These principles, and others courtesy of New Urbanism, such as “mixed housing,” and “mixed use and diversity” now inform civic subsidies and other zoning policies. But are they always cost effective – and equally important – is this really where the New Urbanists wanted to go, when they began promoting a return to aesthetically conscious civic architecture and design?

Also coopted by high-density ideology is the U.S. Green Building Council, who define the the LEED (Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design) building and urban development standards. But leadership in energy efficiency and design has no intrinsic connection with high density. Instead of developing LEED criteria focused on promoting optimal resource efficiency and zero pollution or toxicity – current LEED standards inordinately emphasize ultra dense housing within a maze of other earth friendly and sustainable criteria, some of them obviously great ideas, and others that appear more ideologically derived.

For example, according to local sources, in California, to get basic LEED certification for a home, you have to earn 45 points. There are plentiful ways to earn points, since the LEED “Platinum” certification requires 90 points. But nothing earns LEED points like high density. A builder can get 4 points by building “high density” housing, and another 10 points are available simply by building a home within a LEED certified neighborhood. The high-density points from just these two criteria earn up to 14 out of the 45 points required for LEED certification for homes, with numerous other criteria driving additional point incentives towards high density. If you refer to the USGBC’s LEED certification for buildings version 2.2 “LEED for New Construction,” you will see their criteria awards points for measures such as not building on farmland, wildlife habitat, or near water. Additional points are earned if developers build near light rail stations, construct plentiful public bike racks, and never build in excess of the mandated minimum parking spaces for automobiles. And of course, the minimum average density of a LEED certified community of residences must be ten homes per acre.

Along with LEED for homes and buildings, as described above, we now have LEED for Neighborhoods, or LEED ND, also emphasizing high density as a fundamental criteria for certification. Review USGBC’s May 2008 draft of LEED ND standards “LEED ND Draft Project Checklist” to see where the big points are scored. Basic LEED ND certification as it is currently proposed requires 40 points, with a “platinum” certification requiring 80 points. There are some good ideas reflected in the LEED ND criteria, such as 5 points for storm water management, or up to 3 points for energy efficiency in buildings. But most of the big point earners in LEED ND simply scream high density: 10 points for “preferred location,” based on proximity to mass transit, 8 points for “reduced automobile dependence,” and 7 points for “compact development” (to get 7 points here you must develop seventy units per acre); if you build an ultra high density development, you have already earned 25 of the 40 necessary points for LEED ND.

About one year ago, we published one of many critiques of the high density bias of conventional environmentalist wisdom, in particular, a critique of new urbanism, making eight claims challenging the principles of new urbanism. The only amendment to these criticisms is that they are leveled more generally against the entire “smart growth” ideology, variously advocated by the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU), NewUrbanism.org, the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBG), friends of smart growth at the Natural Resources Defence Council (NRDC), and every analyst, activist, academic or policymaker who is convinced that higher density is always better.

Eight Criticisms of Smart Growth Policies:
1 – Artificially and selectively inflate land values, making housing less affordable,
2 – Emphasize public space over private space,
3 – Make war on the car,
4 – Promote high-density infill in low density neighborhoods,
5 – Prefer open space to homes, but not to biofuel crops, solar fields, or wind farms,
6 – Presume that social problems will be alleviated through forcing everyone to live in ultra high density, mixed neighborhoods,
7 – Incorrectly claim there is a shortage of open space and farmland,
8 – Pretend they have the final answer; that their precepts are beyond debate.

Rather than expand yet again upon these criticisms, our intention here is to present an alternative ideology – one that embraces much of new urbanism and LEED concepts, but from an entirely different perspective, one that believes a diversity of privately held, lower density human habitation over wider areas can manage ecosystems as well or better than the tightly managed manifestations of high-density ideology, while furthering property rights, innovation, initiative, and economic pluralism with respect to land development.

So herewith we offer “Principles of New Suburbanism,” not to refute the virtues of high density, which we believe always have and always will effectively emerge, but to extol the virtues of low density. In this philosophy we believe human stewardship and pluralistic private land ownership, combined with 21st century clean technologies, can enable a suburban and exurban landscape that would spread bucolic and utterly clean low density communities across thousands of square miles. And wildlife would flourish, farms would flourish, and homes would tuck into the folds and fissures of the land like the farmhouses of Provence.

PRINCIPLES OF NEW SUBURBANISM

(1) Compatible with New Urbanism: Both of these architectural and urban/exurban planning ideologies place the central emphasis on aesthetic imperatives – both are equally committed to creating a sense of place in new communities. New Suburbanists support high density zoning preferences in the urban core of large cities. New Suburbanists enthusiastically support building 21st century cities, with high-rises and plentiful car-independent transit options and everything else inimical to the central cores of megacities.

(2) Land is Abundant: There is abundant available land for low density suburban and exurban development. New Suburbanists encourage zoning that recognizes the importance of progressively lower density zoning from urban cores, instead of draconican “urban service boundaries” that arbitrarily restrict development, especially low density development.

(3) Car Friendly: Personal transportation devices are tantalizingly close to becoming ultra safe conveyances that can drive on full autopilot and have zero environmental footprint, and we are within a few decades at most of having abundant clean energy. The age of the personal driving machine has just begun.

(4) Road Friendly: Roads are the most versatile of all mass transit corridors since people, bicycles, cars, busses, trolleys, and trucks can all travel on or alongside roads. Commercial areas should be car-friendly as well as bike and pedestrian friendly – fortunately since land is abundant, this is not all that difficult.

(5) Decentralized & Off-Grid Friendly: New communities can have neighborhood-scale groundwater extraction and distribution systems, as well as water treatment and irrigation systems, or complete and independent systems for single homes. Using new off-grid technologies, clean and cost-effective water & energy autarky can be achieved at a household or neighborhood basis, often allowing lower taxes through avoiding more expensive public facilities.

(6) Farm & EcoSystem Friendly: Via the economic pluralism fostered by implementing new suburbanist inspired highly flexible and low density residential zoning, i.e., small independently owned, often independently constructed homes on large lots of .5 to 20 acres, with frequently modest interior square footage, you create the potential for a vibrant market in small property leases for specialty farming. Through zoning (or protecting) vast tracts of outer suburb and exurban lands according to new suburbanist precepts where low density home building and road building is encouraged or enforced instead of squelched or abandoned, you create a market for relatively cheap abundant land, making more affordable acquistion of land set-asides for agriculture or nature conservancies.

(7) Aesthetically Committed: By adopting new suburbanist zoning, permitting more diverse, progressively lower density developments based on the distance from existing urban concentrations, many of the excesses of over-regulated, artificially dense, supposedly “green” contemporary suburban developments could be avoided. There is a beauty to simply letting development take its natural course, yielding penumbras of habitation following the roads and the landscape like a life affirming circulation system, instead of something that is malevolent and must be contained.

All the essence of New Urbanism, all of its inspiring call to create the 21st century’s version of cities and buildings that are welcoming spaces are still within New Suburbanism, with none of the stridency and coercion or pork of the powerful high density coalition, without the need to make of us nothing more than punitively taxed, eco-pentinent sardines.

At its heart, New Suburbanism is the necessary counterpart to New Urbanism as it has become, constrained as it is by an imbalanced, unnecessary bias towards high density. New Suburbanism gives back to our cities and towns their freedom; gives us abundant land; gives us affordable homes; gives our cities turned suburbs turned exurbs the unforced, organic, natural and easy transition from dense to sparse. If New Urbanism defines the aesthetic of our new and renewed cities, than New Suburbanism helps define the aesthetic interface between city and country; it gives us back the smooth transition from urban chic to country soul.

Posted in Architecture, Bicycles, Buildings, Cars, Energy, Energy Efficiency, Ideas, Humanities, & Education, Other, Philosophy, Policies & Solutions, Policy, Law, & Government, Solar, Transportation, Wind11 Comments

Fuel Cell Development in China

Will Fuel Cells Ever Be Clean, Cheap, Efficient?
Shanghai Skyline
Shanghai’s Ultra-Modern Skyline
Rising to Meet the 21st Century

Editor’s Note: Public and private investment in fuel cell development in China over the next few years is projected to be over (US)$500 million. The initial priority is to develop fuel cells for transportation applications, beginning with busses and electric powered bicycles. Fuel cells convert hydrogen into electricity, creating almost no pollution in the process. The most advanced lithium ion batteries can only store about 300 watt hours per kilogram, meaning the range of battery-powered electric vehicles is fairly limited. A fuel cell and hydrogen tank, by contrast, can store about 900 watt hours per kilogram, creating a viable range for bicycles and busses that don’t pollute.

But hydrogen fuel cell power has daunting technological hurdles that must be overcome before they can help solve pollution or energy challenges. Fuel cells are still extremely expensive, over $4,000 per kilowatt, and in transportation applications fuel cells are still very fragile. Storing and distributing hydrogen is still very difficult, because hydrogen as a gas contains very little energy by volume, and therefore must be either liquified or stored under extreme pressure in order to deliver meaningful amounts of energy. Finally, hydrogen itself must be extracted from other fossil fuel, or manufactured using electricity and water. So even if hydrogen becomes the clean energy of choice, hydrogen will have to be manufactured using other fuels.

The Chinese, with their rapidly industrializing nation of over a billion people, certainly are aware of the technological and economic hurdles that stand between today’s nascent hydrogen economy and the potential of the hydrogen economy as envisioned by environmentalists. But their energy and pollution challenges are matched by equally impressive financial and technological resources. It may indeed be in China where hydrogen finds its first commercial niche.

The demand for alternative fuels in China

is driven by the Chinese government’s desire to reduce air pollution, particularly in urban centres, and reduce the country’s dependence on imported oil. Preparing to host the 2008 Olympics is also putting pressure on the Government of China to make the necessary investments. The annual alternative fuels market in China is projected to grow from $75 million in 2002 to $1.8 billion by 2008.

The main opportunities for fuel cell technologies are in the development of prototypes of fuel cell engines and for fuel cell fuelling stations. The main opportunities for compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquified petroleum gas (LPG) technologies are for retrofitting old diesel engines, building new engines, providing engine and related parts that improve the efficiency of CNG/LPG engines and building refuelling stations.

Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics Logo

The Chinese fuel cell market has strong local players including the Fuyuan Century Fuel Cell Power Co. Ltd., the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, and Shanghai Shen-Li High Tech Co Ltd. U.S. firms have been successful at penetrating the CNG/LPG bus market in China. Some examples firms include Cummins-Westport, Impco Technologies and Witco Systems.

Transport authorities are looking for well-designed buses that suit their individual local environments, maintenance staff training and a high level of service.

CNG engine testing must be done in China and there are adequate test facilities. Once a vehicle is on the road there is no formal testing nor any requirement for regular in-service emissions testing. However, strict maintenance and training is essential to maintain strong customer satisfaction.

Beijing 2008 Logo
China 2008 Olympics

The Chinese government’s goals to improve the quality of air in major Chinese cities and to reduce its dependence on imported oil are the main long-term drivers of market growth in the alternative fuel bus market in China. With the world’s eyes on China for the 2008 summer Olympics, the Chinese government is actively investing in alternative fuel buses to demonstrate the progressiveness of their country to the world.

China has six of the world’s 10 most-polluted cities. The Chinese government has set a time line to improve emission standards for vehicles in China. Vehicles were to meet Euro II standards by January 1, 2003 in Beijing and by January 1, 2005 in the rest of China. Chinese emission standards are to increase to meet Euro III by January 1, 2005 in Beijing and by January 1, 2010 in the rest of the country.

China CP Logo

China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) has issued a new Automotive Industry Development Policy. The new policy, that became effective on June 1, 2004, stipulates that average fuel consumption of new cars should be reduced by 15% by the year 2010. Although the policy does not provide details as to how this objective will be met, it is expected that the development and application of new technologies to reduce reliance on fuel will be strongly encouraged by NDRC.

Approximately 1 million buses were produced in China in 2002. This was an increase of 25% over production in 2001.

The annual alternative fuels market in China is projected to grow from $75 million in 2002 to $1.8 billion by 2008.

Alternative fuel technologies that represent the greatest opportunities for Canadian firms in China are compressed natural gas, liquified petroleum gas and fuel cells. In terms of market development, CNG/LPG engines are fully commercialized and are in a growth market, while fuel cell engines are still in the pre-commercialization stage.

China represents one of the largest potential markets for fuel cells in the world. Transportation is considered to be the most important initial market for fuel cells in China. The market for replacing batteries in electric bicycles is expected to be the earliest market to be commercialized, followed by buses.

Seventy-four percent of the application of fuel cells in China focuses on transportation. Fifty-four percent of fuel cell technology in China is based on proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), the most prominent fuel cell technology for transportation applications worldwide.

About 350 employees at more than 60 institutions and companies work on the development of fuel cell technology. Sixty percent of these organizations are located in the provinces of Beijing and Shanghai.

Chinese Fuel Cell Bus
China’s First Fuel Cell Bus (75KW)
Photo: Chinese Academy of Sciences

Under China’s fuel cell roadmap, more than 100 buses will have been tested under demonstration projects between 2005 and 2010. More than 1000 fuel cellpowered buses will be utilized in regular bus operations between 2008 and 2020.

The Chinese government began encouraging the use of alternative fuels in 1999 with a clean vehicle demonstration project in China’s 12 largest cities.

China is ranked seventh in the world in the number of vehicles using CNG/LPG fuel, behind major developing countries like Argentina, Brazil and India. In 2003, there were approximately 110,000 CNG/LPG vehicles on China’s roads, 19 000 of those vehicles being buses. That year, China had 368 refuelling stations, with over half located in Shanghai and Beijing.

The choice between LPG or CNG as alternative fuel mainly depends on the availability of that particular fuel in a city or province. The limited number of refuelling stations is one of the main inhibitors of changing from diesel to CNG or LPG.

The main opportunities for fuel cell technologies are in the development of prototypes of fuel cell engines and fuel cell fuelling stations. These research and development (R&D) opportunities require a partnership with relevant Chinese organizations.

In 2002, the Chinese government announced that it would invest approximately $18 million in a three-year PEMFC development program. Most of these funds will go toward the development of 75 kW and 150 kW PEMFC systems at the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics.

China’s two main cities, Beijing and Shanghai, have been selected by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) of the World Bank for the Fuel Cell Bus Demonstration Project. Under this project, the GEF will sponsor the deployment of six fuel cell buses and one hydrogen filling station each to both Beijing and Shanghai. The three-year demonstration trials will see these buses log over 1.6 million kilometres. The project is funded with $18 million from the GEF, $15 million from Chinese government, $7.5 million each from the cities of Beijing and Shanghai and $6 million from private companies. Opportunities stemming from the project are to supply completed fuel cell buses, build hydrogen refuelling stations and provide consulting services to train Chinese bus operations personnel with the new technology.

Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology Logo
Ministry of Science & Technology

During China’s 10th five-year plan (2001-2005), the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) approved a $165-million R&D program to develop advanced hybrid-electric drive and fuel cell-vehicles. Private companies are likely to invest another $300-450 million over the same time period. One major aim of the project is to develop two prototypes for 150 kW fuel cell buses by 2005. Under the funding, Shen-Li High Tech and Dalian Sunrise will develop hydrogen-based engine prototypes for vehicles to be assembled by Tsinghua University and the Shanghai Fuel Cell Vehicle Powertrain Company.

Under the MOST’s 973 program, the Government is spending approximately $5.6 million on the research of hydrogen storage materials, fuel cell membranes and catalysts. One of the main grantees under this program is Hong Kong University (HKUST), which is working on carbon nano materials as a hydrogen storage solution.

In addition to the GEF hydrogen station, Shanghai is working on its own hydrogen infrastructure project. The city will host the World Expo in 2010 and is trying to deploy its own clean energy and fuel cell buses for the event. The supply of hydrogen as a fuel in Shanghai will not be as difficult as in many other cities, mainly due to the region’s vast and flexible fuel sources. In Shanghai alone, four chemical companies have been producing enough hydrogen as an industrial by-product to at least meet the short-term consumer needs of Shanghai.

The main opportunities for CNG/LPG technologies are for retrofitting old diesel engines, building new engines that meet current emission standards, providing engine and related parts that improve the efficiency of CNG/LPG engines and in building refuelling stations.the development of 75 kW and 150 kW PEMFC systems at the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics.

The Beijing transport authority currently has 2000 buses that run on CNG engines. The authority plans to have its 118 000 bus fleet running on clean energy by the 2008 Olympics. Ninety percent of the fleet will be retrofitted to use CNG and the remaining buses will be replaced with new CNG new engine buses.

The Shanghai Government plans to purchase 3000 CNG buses in the next 2-3 years and put 20 hydrogen buses, 300 hydrogen taxi & 1,000 electric vehicles in operation by 2010.

Guangzhou Transportation Commission and its subordinated bus companies has a fleet of 6802 buses. It currently has 603 buses running on LPG engines. In the end of 2004, Guangzhou will complete switching old diesel engines to LPG engines in 2,390 buses. Guangzhou plans to make all the buses in the city into LPG buses by 2005. In the first half of 2004, Guangzhou had built 3 new LPG fueling stations. Guangzhou plans to set up 20 new LPG fuelling stations by the end of 2004.

The transport authorities of Tianjin (LPG), Xian (CNG), Chongqing (CNG), Guangzhou (LPG), Harbin (LPG), Shenzhen (LPG), Urumchi (CNG/LPG), Changchun (LPG/CNG), Hainan province (LPG) and the middle area of Sichuan (CNG) are following Beijing’s lead in moving to alternative fuel-powered buses.

The Hong Kong SAR government has initiated a scheme to replace 18,000 diesel taxis to LPG models by 2005. It is expected that the project will be extended to the 8,000 mini-buses and 6000 city buses for replacement to LPG/CNG or fuel cell models.
For more information go to: www.emsd.gov.hk/emsd/eng/sgi/lpg.shtml

KEY PLAYERS

The five largest bus manufacturers in China account for 58% of local bus production. They are (by percentage of local production) Changan Auto (15.7%), Harbin Harfei (14.4%), Chancghe Aircraft (11.9%), Shanghai-GM-Wuling (8.2%) and FAW (7.9%).

Fuyuan Century Fuel Cell Power Logo
Fuyuan Century Fuel Cell Power

The Fuyuan Century Fuel Cell Power company is developing PEMFC technology. It has developed stacks ranging in size from 3 kW to 30 kW. In 1998, the company developed the first fuel cell-powered passenger vehicle in China in conjunction with the Automotive Engineering Department of Tsinghua University, installing a 5 kW stack into a prototype golf cart. More recently, Fuyuan has built and tested 40 kW PEMFCs for buses, and commenced work on a 100 kW PEMFC program for electric buses. Its sister company, Fuyuan Pioneer New Energy Material, specializes in the R&D and production of PEMFC components, including carbon, composite and metal bipolar plates, and PEMFC membrane.

Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP) has been carrying out fuel cell R&D for more than 30 years. A dedicated fuel cell R&D centre was established in 1998. The centre employs more than 50 researchers and engineers. Most of these employees are working on PEMFC development. DICP has filed around 25 patents concerning PEMFC technology. Research areas have included the development of thin metal bipolar plates that are easy to manufacture, and the development of MEA manufacturing processes. In spring 2003, the DICP supplied its new 75 kW PEM stack to Tsinghua University, which integrated the unit in a bus.

Founded in 1998, Shanghai Shen-Li High Tech Co. Ltd. is developing PEM fuel cells for a whole array of applications, including mini-buses. Currently employing about 30 people in a 1500-square-metre facility, it has developed a series of prototypes, ranging in output from 10 kW to 50 kW.

Beijing Jinfeng Aerospace Development Company is the country’s largest producer of hydrogen storing metals. The company is working on possible uses of hydrogen for transport applications.

Smog in Beijing
Smog Hangs Over Beijing: China has six
of the world’s ten most polluted cities
Photo: United States EPA

The China Association for Hydrogen Energy (CAHE) aims to promote hydrogen as a clean fuel for fuel cells and various other applications. The association is organizing the HYFORUM event, one of the largest hydrogen- and fuel cellrelated conferences in China. A Mercedes-Benz Citaro bus powered by a hydrogen fuel cell built by Ballard was showcased at the HYForum conference in Beijing in May 2004.

Tsinghua University is in charge of two national key fundamental projects: Fundamental Research for Hydrogen Production, Storage and Transportation in Large Scale and Relative Fuel Cells, and Fuel Cell Engines Used for Buses. The university is working on developing PEM fuel cells, fuel cell engines and making hydrogen from ethanol. Together with Beijing LN Power Sources, Tsinghua University demonstrated various vehicles in 2001, one of which was a small, 12 seater bus (top speed 90 km/h, range 160 km). Tsinghua University is expected to use a 80 kW engine to develop another prototype bus.

Cummins Westport Inc. (CWI) and Dongfeng Cummins Engine Company Ltd. (DCEC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding for a comprehensive supply agreement enabling DCEC to manufacture CWI natural gas B-series engines in China. CWI will supply natural gas-specific components for the B Gas International (BGI) engine to be manufactured by DCEC at its manufacturing facilities located in Xiangfan. Manufacturing is expected to begin in early 2005. This agreement to manufacture in China will enable CWI to access a broader customer base and to continue lowering its product cost. To date CWI has sold more than 2,000 CNG engines in Beijing, 40 in Chongqing and 10 in Chengdu.

In 2004, Witco Systems Inc. (U.S.) and Pressed Steel Tank Co. formed a joint venture company, Jian Cui Vehicles Co. Ltd. The joint venture will install 60 fast-fill CNG stations in southwestern China’s Sichuan province and then begin converting more than 50,000 diesel-fueled buses to allow them to run on a combination of diesel fuel and compressed natural gas. Work on the CNG stations was finished in July 2004. Other suppliers to the joint venture include CleanFuel USA Inc. U.S.), an alternative fuel technology company; FuelMaker Corp. (Toronto, Ontario), a manufacturer of refuelling systems; Angi International (Milton, Ontario), a manufacturer of fast-fill stations for compressed natural gas; and Fueling Technologies Inc (Concord, Ontario), a manufacturer of large fast-fill stations and dispensers.

Canadian firms active in China’s CNG/LPG market include Kraus Global and IMW Industries who have sold and installed CNG dispensers/refueling stations in China.

In 2003, IMPCO Technologies (U.S.), a manufacturer of alternative fuel systems technology for internal combustion, formed a joint venture with China Natural Gas Corporation (CNGC), a subsidiary of the China National Petroleum Corporation, to market and sell their gaseous fuel products in Western China.

Guangzhou Denway Motors Ltd., the first LPG single-fuel bus maker in South China, has produced over 100 LPG single-fuel buses, which were launched in Guangzhou and Shenzhen.

WHO IS BUYING?

Beijing’s transport authority has the largest, low-emissions CNG bus fleet in the world, with over 2,000 CNG engines. The Authority plans to have its entire 118,000 bus fleet operating on clean energy by the 2008 Olympics (90% retrofitted and 10% replaced with new engines). It has 400 trained service personnel for CNG-powered buses. Key contacts in Beijing include the Beijing Municipal Committee of Transportation which sets objectives/plans and implement them, and the Beijing Public Transportation Corporation and Beijing Bashi Corporation which operate the buses.

The following government bureaus in the province of Shanghai are involved in developing and implementing the plans for alternative fuel vehicles:

o Shanghai Environment Bureau is responsible for setting up the environment protection standards to the products

o Shanghai Development & Reform Commission (SDRC) is responsible for the detailed plan to reach the government’s goal of developing vehicles with alternative energy

o Shanghai Urban Transit Administration Bureau is responsible for implementing SDRC’s plan (including procurement) and provide feedback to SDRC

o Shanghai Science & Technology Commission is responsible for promoting the new technology

Transport authorities are looking for well-designed buses that are suited to their individual local environments, proper training of their maintenance staff and, when needed, a high-level of service from the original manufacturer.

About the Author:
Gordon Feller is the Director of
ReNewUSA and editor of
Urban Age Magazine.
In addition to extensive journalistic coverage of the worldwide energy sector and emerging environmental businesses, Feller has served as a senior-level advisor to companies investing in new technologies, processes and solutions. The list of clients ranges from small and little known firms to large well known firms: HP, Columbia Chemical, Phelps Dodge, Chevron, Apple, AT&T, IBM. Feller’s first work assessing environmentally sound economic policies was published during his freshman year at Columbia University. He continued there for four more years, finishing with a graduate degree in international affairs. He can be reached via editor@ecoworld.com.

Email the Editor about this Article
EcoWorld - Nature and Technology in Harmony

Posted in Air Pollution, Bicycles, Buses, Cars, Consumption, Electricity, Energy, Energy & Fuels, Engineering, Fuel Cells, Hydrogen, Infrastructure, Natural Gas, Organizations, Other, Policies & Solutions, Science, Space, & Technology, Services, Transportation3 Comments


No Posts in Category
Advertisement