Watch for the Wrecking Ball, Kaleefornya

Do you get the impression Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has reached a level of flippant frustration in his efforts to “fix Kaleefornya?”

The latest budget impasse may be the final, insulting reality that blew away any illusion he had that the nation’s most populous state, and one of the world’s largest economies, can be rationally governed.

His recent executive order to reduce state employees’ pay to the federal minimum wage level, and to lay off thousands of part-time state employees, might be an expression of peevish exasperation, but it does strike at the heart of California’s chronic budget problem, namely bloated staffing and overpaid government employees.

Not surprisingly, his actions were greeted with howling protests from the various International Brotherhoods of Public Treasury Pirates, i.e., public-employee unions, as well as by the mutiny of the state’s controller, a Democrat.

The largest union has filed suit against the governor in an effort to reverse his decree, and thus demonstrate, once again, that unions control state government, not the governor or anyone else.

Because Schwarzenegger was rushed into the governorship on the shoulders of voters disgusted with his feckless predecessor, Gray Davis, whom they had abruptly fired in a recall election, it was reasonable for Schwarzenegger to believe he had a mandate to repair state government – returning it to some semblance of fiscal sanity and honest representative democracy.

To that effect, he correctly identified the state’s fundamental problems and, through four initiatives placed on the 2005 ballot, sought voter approval of government reforms to address those problems.

To control spending, he wanted a line-item veto on the budget, something California governors had until 1983. He wanted an independent panel of retired judges, rather than self-interested politicians, to determine legislative districts, which are now unscrupulously drawn to secure sinecures for Democrats and some Republicans.

He wanted to improve the quality of education by improving the quality of teachers, awarding tenure after five years rather than just two. He proposed prudent budgetary restraints that would trigger spending cuts when necessary.

His ballot initiative to halt the growth of the outrageous public-employee pension liability by converting these pensions to defined contribution plans – like those in the private sector – was withdrawn under heavy fire from the public-employee unions.

He also supported efforts to curtail the devious practice of public-employee unions to make political contributions without the express consent of their dues-paying members.

Yet all of his ballot initiatives were defeated, and today, with the current budget impasse, and the usual partisan floundering in the Legislature, polls indicate the majority of Californians blame the governor. It is understandable, then, that Schwarzenegger might become grumpy and disillusioned with his job.

The real problem Schwarzenegger failed to identify was the neurotic capriciousness of California voters – a character flaw that makes them wholly unreliable in a struggle of the magnitude he was willing to lead. In 2005, he was counting on them to support his reform initiatives. He was disappointed.

Now, California has another budget lingering in limbo because Democrats and Republicans, the Shiites and Sunnis of state politics, cannot agree on how to address the irresponsible level of state spending that leaves California billions of dollars in debt every year.

The Democrats want to increase taxes and keep spending, which will ensure that the state maintains its position as the highest-taxed state in the union. Most Republicans want to reduce spending and not increase taxes.

That the state is seriously in debt is due to the profligate, irresponsible levels of spending that were established well before Schwarzenegger became governor. In the three years before he came to office, California state government increased its spending by 36 percent – more than double the rate of inflation and of population growth over the same period.

The most-favored recipients of legislated largesse are the state’s elected officials and government employees – the engineers of legal larceny. Thanks to the insidious symbiosis between these partners in piggery, public pay, benefits, and staffing continue to exceed prudent levels.

To accommodate its more than 200,000 employees, state government is riddled with redundancy, inefficiency and unnecessary bureaucracy.

With many of these employees eligible for retirement soon, funding California’s generous public-employee pension plans will become an even greater burden for California taxpayers to bear. Unscrupulous pension padding by some public employees only increases that burden.

All of this is what Schwarzenegger has tried to confront, but neither he nor any governor will be able to fix Kaleefornya alone. Sometimes things must totally collapse before they can be rebuilt.

I guess that is what Californians are going to let happen. Watch out for the wrecking ball.

Author Randy Alcorn is a columnist with the Santa Maria Times, where this editorial originally appeared on August 17th, 2008. Republished with permission.

2 Responses to “Watch for the Wrecking Ball, Kaleefornya”
  1. It’s about time someone started telling the truth about how California is controlled by public sector unions, whose use of taxpayer’s money (via union dues, usually mandatory) is the reason voters are brainwashed one election after another. There is nothing wrong with the ideals of unions, but taxpayer’s money should not be used to provide benefits for public employees that are far better than what private sector taxpayers get through social security, nor should it be used to control our elections.

  2. Lynne Benson says:

    Why don’t we merge every public sector pension fund with social security? That would restore solvency to the balance sheets of state and local governments, save social security, rescue our economy from recession, and end the plight of public employees being slaves to their eventual lavish pensions?


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.