Archive for the ‘Nature’ Category

Designing Drought-Resistant Crops

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Droughts are a farmer’s worst nightmare: Crops meant for the dinner table wither away in the dry heat leaving people hungry and farmers broke.

Not all plants are as sensitive to drought, though, and it is the genetic makeup of these more resilient plants that is of interest to scientists who feel the need to develop crops that can handle drastic shifts in their environments.

U.S and Finnish researchers recently discovered the specific gene responsible for controlling the amount of water released by the plant as it absorbs carbon dioxide-more specifically, the gene that controls the plant’s stomata.

The stomatic pore in a tomato leaf.
(Photo: Wikipedia)

All leaves are covered with stomata, which are tiny pores used to suck up carbon dioxide and to release water vapor back into the air.

Some of the ‘hardier’ plants close up their stomatal pores when ozone levels increase.

This reaction also reduces the amount of water lost during the harsher seasons. (It is interesting to note that plants suffer from excessive amounts of ozone rather than thriving in a CO2 rich environment when they use this specific gas for growth.)

The gene in question controls when the stomata are open or closed. Unfortunately, with their stomata closed, plants are unable to absorb the excessive amounts of CO2 in our atmosphere.

Up to 95% of water loss occurs through these pores while they are open, so manipulating the genetic makeup of plants to increase their sensitivity to droughts (forcing them to close their stomata) could have a positive effect on their survivability: A little water lasts much longer.

This may slow plant growth since CO2 is a necessary component for photosynthesis and plant development (with the stomatal pores closed, less CO2 makes it into the plants’ system), but a smaller plant is still better than a dead one.

Researchers claim that within the next few years plants could be genetically modified to hold on to the precious water that is so hard to come by during a drought, while still being able to absorb the CO2 they need for photosynthesis.  

This is a win-win situation: It will allow crops to survive in arid regions while also sequestering the atmosphere’s CO2.

via Science Daily

Reducing Animal Populations with Birth Control

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

There is one animal that drivers fear more than any other: the deer. More than 1.5 million deer find their ways in front of cars within the United States causing over 1 billion dollars in property damage! The deer population has increased drastically since the first half of the twentieth century, when their numbers were a meager 500,000. Now with an overwhelming number of deer in the country, they are considered a nuisance in many suburban areas and a hazard to each other. Large populations of other species-many of them invasive-like grey squirrels, pigeons, Canadian geese and feral pets also have a negative effect on their environments.

Fortunately, there may soon be a way to humanely reduce pest animal populations in areas when hunting isn’t a feasible or appealing option. Though many people scoff at the idea, a birth control is the answer. It may seem unfair to manipulate the breeding behavior of various species when we have already affected everything else in their environment, but it is a more appealing choice than killing off the animals-especially when it comes to non-prey animals. It is also ironic that some of the species in question-like white-tailed deer and Canadian geese-were encouraged to reproduce when they faced extinction earlier in the century, but now their increasing numbers have made them a nuisance. Not only that, but with a huge population, animals are more susceptible to disease and starvation when food is harder to come by.

Gonacon is an effective sterilization technique intended to be used on a variety of pest species such as deer, horses, squirrels and feral hogs, cats and dogs. One dose of Gonacon ranges from $2-10, but trapping or darting a deer to administer the injection can cost upwards of $500-$1000. Researchers are trying to find alternative methods for administering the drug, though. Once injected, the animal in question is sterile for 2-4 years and this puts a dent in the population. Gonacon is not currently available, but The Environmental Protection Agency is reviewing applications to market the drug.

Pest species come in a variety of forms and can cause a surprising amount of damage to public areas. The Clemson Campus in South Carolina, for example, is eager to find a way to humanely deal with their squirrel population: Gray squirrels may be cute, but their habit of gnawing away at tree bark can destroy countless mature trees. In a research paper discussing the damage caused by the squirrels, researchers found that “the loss of one mature tree from gray squirrels on Clemson’s campus to be $13,275.00. Using these estimates, damage caused by gray squirrels on Clemson’s campus may exceed $1.3 million dollars.” For more information regarding the research paper click HERE.

Naturally, there are concerns dealing with the gonacon, like whether remnants of the drug will make their way into the environment. The Gonacon Q and A sheet explains that this is not an issue: “The vaccine consists of proteins; therefore, a secondary consumer could not be contracepted as proteins are broken down in the stomach.”  Another frustration is that a deer can still get run over by a car, or succumb to disease after the government has already spent hundreds of dollars trapping the animal for treatment. Unfortunately, this is a variable that we don’t have any control over.

Diazacon is another contraceptive that is administered orally. It is mainly used on bird species that are easily fed. Diazacon needs to be ingested daily for maximum effectiveness, but this isn’t a problem since birds are eager to return to an easy meal fairly quickly. (They gobble up the treated feed quickly and don’t leave anything for native wild birds to accidentally peck at either.) Feeding geese and monk parakeets is definitely a less stressful way to control their populations than it is to force them into nets and relocate the birds. It probably would not have a drastic effect on their behavior either, since much of their food is already provided by people who happily feed the birds. Diazacon is currently available for controlling certain avian populations and using the product is as easy as feeding the eager birds every day.

Canadian geese are one of the target species. Thanks to the International Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the introduction of flocks to various areas in the 60’s, the once almost extinct Canadian Goose population has exploded into giant flocks that no longer feel the need to migrate from the public parks that they call home. Canadian geese are now a formidable challenge on golf courses. They also damage crops and lawns, and the feces they leave behind makes areas less appealing and degrades the water quality of nearby ponds or lakes.

Another bird that could benefit from diazacon is the monk parakeet mentioned previously. These birds are intelligent, beautiful and long lived (up to 35 years) and they have made their home in various U.S cities after escaping captivity (and being released by well meaning owners) years ago. They are a gregarious species that work together to weave giant nests around trees, and on numerous occasions, around electrical towers. This interferes with communications and utility companies have exterminated the birds via trapping and gassing in the past.

Using either diazacon or gonacon on pest populations could help reduce pest animal numbers without having to resort to traumatic population control techniques in our own backyards.

Just a dash of Gonacon, and fewer deer without culling.
(Photo: EcoWorld)

Algalita - Shrinking The World’s Largest Garbage Patch

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

While racing towards Los Angeles from Hawaii on his yacht, Charles Moore decided to stray from the typical route and take what he thought would be an easy shortcut through the North Pacific gyre. Expecting to see nothing by calm, shimmering water in one of the most secluded regions of the ocean, Moore was shocked to find himself surrounded by mounds of garbage instead. For almost a week, Moore would walk on deck just to stare at sun-bleached toys, ropes, cups, and eerie shadows of plastic bags floating underneath the waves.

The North Pacific Gyre, noted for calm stable waters, and circular undersea currents, is calculated to contain over 100 million tons of trash. After its discovery in 1997, the area was dubbed the Eastern Garbage Patch by oceanographer, Curtis Ebbesmeyer.

During the late 1980’s, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) had speculated that huge quantities of debris were trapped by ocean currents. They explained that these masses of garbage would continue to accumulate where currents flowed around in circles, creating an effect similar to a vortex by trapping the garbage inside. The North Pacific gyre had been mentioned by NOAA, but didn’t receive much attention until Moore sailed through the area during the 1997 Transpac competition.
post resumes below image

The gyres of the world’s oceans.
(Photo: Algalita Marine Research Foundation)

It was no surprise that Moore, having grown up by the ocean and raised by an avid sailor, founded the Algalita Marine Research Foundation in 1994. This organization, based in Long Beach, California, started out studying the ocean’s chemical and bacterial properties, but their focus changed after Moore discovered the seemingly endless plastic soup during his unforgettable race.

Algalita quotes Moore on the subject: “there were shampoo caps and soap bottles and plastic bags and fishing floats as far as I could see. Here I was in the middle of the ocean, and there was nowhere I could go to avoid the plastic.”

Scientists estimate the swirling mass of plastics and debris is two times the size of Texas. In fact, the Pacific gyre has now separated into two ever increasing patches known as the Western and Eastern Pacific Garbage Patches (combined, they are called the Great Pacific Garbage Patch). This oceanic dumping ground is now a major spot for studying the effects of plastics on marine life.

Eighty percent of the trash floating in the patch is plastic. These plastics are slowly broken down into little pieces by the streaming sunlight and corrosive saltwater. Over time, these plastic chips will degrade to the size of dust particles which can easily become ingested by zooplankton. The effects of this on the entire marine food chain could be catastrophic. Even now, part of the ‘sand’ we find on the popular shorelines is composed of eroded plastic pieces mixed in with the natural crumbled coral and volcanic rock.

Algalita is one of many foundations dedicated to protecting the world’s oceans. One can hope that the growth of these giant garbage patches may be slowed down with the foundations’ restoration projects and outreach programs. If not, at least, their constant research on the effects of plastics and contaminants on marine environments will be better understood. This is the first step for finding a solution.

Unfortunately, we live in a world where almost everything is disposable, and it will take some time for that to change.

Sea Shepherds Use Any Measures to Protect Their Flock

Wednesday, December 31st, 2008

Almost ten years ago, Time Magazine proclaimed Paul Watson as one of the major environmental heroes of the 20th century. During the 1970s Watson was part of numerous Greenpeace campaigns against whaling, but he always felt that these placid confrontations had little result against saving whales. Some of these graceful animals even died from attacks with Greenpeace Zodiacs swarming around whaling vessels.

According to Watson’s biography, everything came to light in 1975, as he was forced to watch a sperm whale die a few feet from his boat after it had been harpooned by Russian hunters. This was just not acceptable.

Watson didn’t mesh well with Greenpeace and felt that more extreme measures were necessary for actual results, but his strong opinions didn’t win him any favors: He ended up expelled from the board of directors when he was 27, with only a single vote opposing the decision - his own.

Watson used this opportunity to found the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society which, unlike Greenpeace, uses more aggressive tactics to stop whaling. This doesn’t come without a price, though, and Watson has found himself in jail a few times on charges ranging from attempted murder to intentionally sinking a ship. Sea Shepherd does admit to having sunk at least ten ‘pirate’ whaling ships since 1979 and it is no surprise that a few nations look at this group as a kind of terrorist organization.

The newest ship, named after famed
Australian conservationist Steve Irwin.
(Photo: Sea Shepherd Conservation Society)

If nothing else, the current exploits of the Sea Shepherd is excellent television and it is now part of a more controversial reality TV show airing on Animal Planet. This show, adequately titled ‘Whale Wars’, aired a few months ago and already has millions of devoted fans.

Laws have been set into place to ban whaling, but it remains an issue in countries where whale meat has been a staple for centuries. Japan is one of the major players in the Whale Wars game. Every part of the whale is valued in one form or another by the Japanese, and it is hard for an entire nation to accept a law that interferes with ancient traditions. Japan has tried to find loopholes to allow whaling, such as painting ‘Research Vessel’ on the side of obvious whaling ships, but even these boats seem to turn around when confronted with Watson’s ‘terrorist’ ship.

It will be interesting to see how much of an influence organizations like Sea Shepherd have on the environment where politics have failed. Many people feel that they give environmentalists a bad rap, however it is hard not to respect a man who has given up everything to save a species he cares for deeply.

Greenhouse Provides Glimpses into Past, Present and Future

Tuesday, October 14th, 2008

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia’s capitol, has slowly transformed into a sprawling city over the years, full of silver skyscrapers and modern buildings. The city is home to over 5 million inhabitants and bears little resemblance to the land that used to be covered with date trees and orchards. Riyadh roughly translates to “garden” in Arabic and it is a suitable name for a region with such fertile soil.

It is only fitting that the world’s largest greenhouse will reside in the garden city of Saudi Arabia. Barton Willmore, a British design and architectural planning company is working with the civil engineers at Buro Happold to create the 160 hectare King Abdullah International Gardens (KAIG).

This garden will be housed in two giant interlocking crescent domes with 120ft high ceilings. Costing almost a million dollars per hectare, KAIG will do more than just house a variety of pretty plants: The structure is meant to showcase the various global ecosystems with an underlying lesson in sustainable development.
post resumes below image


King Abdullah International Gardens - The Master Plan
(Source: www.kaig.net)

The high domes eliminate the need for constant air-conditioning by allowing the hot air to float to the ceiling, trapping the cool air below. Rainwater is harvested and stored in underground reservoirs and used for irrigation. Solar panels and wind turbines will generate a large portion of the electricity needed to power the structure.

Once the project is completed in 2010, visitors will walk through a wide range of gardens meant to illustrate the evolutionary history of plants, current ecosystems and finally, the earth’s potential in the future. The last exhibit-”The Garden of Choices” - allows those interested to see how today’s choices directly impact global ecosystems. Various paths stimulate what the world would look like depending on the choices made: visitors zig-zag through lush gardens indicating what would eventually become reality if new environmentally friendly technologies and ideals were adopted.  These gardens gradually recede and transform into an unappealing dry and charred landscape to indicate what would potentially happen with indifference and the continued trends of pollution.

KAIG will hopefully educate visitors in making the right environmental choices, but even if that isn’t the case, at least this man-made wonder will provide breathtaking glimpses into the earth’s botanical past, present and potential future.

Nisus-Environmentally Friendly Pesticides

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

Scuttling in the crevices of every home are a variety of pests that seem to thrive on making the human inhabitants miserable. One of the most hated pests are cockroaches, which are almost impossible to eliminate. It does not matter how clean a house is; one inseminated female roach can explode into an infestation within a matter of weeks. Miniscule amounts of food, such as splattered grease, sugar that lands behind the cupboard or even glue is enough to keep the population going. Trails of ants crawling throughout the house, a single chirping cricket serenading you in the middle of the night and slugs eating up your prized garden are no fun either.

Borates have long been used as a
safer alternative to highly volatile,
synthetic chemical pesticides
(Photo: Nisus Corporation)

Pesticides are the easiest solution, but are not a pleasant option to users concerned about their pets or the birds that make the outdoors so enjoyable. This is where the Nisus Corporation comes into play. Based in Tennessee, Nisus manufactures a variety of environmentally friendly pest control products.

Their granular bait product, sold under the name “Niban”, works unlike other pesticides because it isn’t a real poison. Compared to table salt in toxicity, Niban actually works by altering an insect’s digestive process. After insects ingest Niban, they are unable to absorb the nutrients from the delicious glue, wood or table scraps they had been feasting on before, and starve to death. Humans, pets, birds, fish and amphibians who accidentally eat some of the granules are not affected.

The main ingredient in Niban is Boron, formulated with other ingredients that attract pests. According to Nisus, “Niban poses very low impact to the environment…since boron is already found in virtually all ecosystems…as the Niban granules dissolve, the borates simply become part of the background levels of boron [which is an essential micronutrient for plants and animals].”

Just because the bait is environmentally friendly, does not make it less effective: The Niban Jug just needs a quick shake to deposit the granules on the ground while you walk the perimeter of the building. Smaller granules are available for placement inside the smaller nooks and crannies inside the home. These granules can handle up to 4 inches of rain, are not prone to mold, and don’t degrade with exposure to the sun.

The ominous sound of the shaking Niban jug , should send pests running for the hills.

On a side note: Nisus also developed termiticides made with their patented Borate solution for pre-treatment of building areas. This is a greener alternative and provides long term protection against termites.

Cow Belching Problematic

Friday, September 5th, 2008

Cows are notorious for lazily standing around, nonchalantly chewing their cud while staring into space. Ambitious cows may also spend some time swatting the occasional fly with their tails. It is a simple life, constantly inundated with bouts of flatulence and burps. In fact, the global cattle population is the largest contributor of methane gases in the atmosphere: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that cattle “account for about 28% of global methane emissions from human related activities”.

There are 1.2 billion cows in the world, each equipped with four stomachs full of flora that release gases during the digestive process. Each cow emits over 600 liters of methane created when bacteria in their gut break down all the fibers swallowed by the animal. Globally, livestock produces 80 million metric tons of methane annually! That is a whole lot of gas.

How will small family owned dairies
be able to afford the state-certified
consultants to track animal emissions,
fill out mandatory reports, and meet
their methane-offset obligations?

Argentina’s National Institute of Agricultural Technology conducted a unique study that tested the amount of methane released by individual cows. Methane is a concern, since it is 23 times more effective than carbon dioxide at absorbing heat.

Researchers attached plastic inflatable packs to the cows. Once the cows adjusted to having a red balloon strapped to their backs, they began eating as usual and provided researchers with the required data: The ‘balloon’ backpacks soon filled up with gas collected by an attached tube than ran from the device to the cows’ stomachs. This gas was then analyzed, allowing researchers to determine that an average 550 kg cow released over 800 liters of methane daily. This is much more than expected and provided evidence that cows could account for 30% of methane emissions in Argentina

In order to reduce to the amount of methane released, cows are occasionally fed grasses that are easier to digest than grains like alfalfa. Gramina, an Australian biotechnology company, is even engineering a special grass that will help cut down on all the bovine burping.

Burping is considered rude at the dinner table, but who knew it was such a big environmental issue?

Check out more info at the Epa’s ruminant livestock page

Related article can be found at Reuters