Archive for the ‘Water’ Category

Capitol Hill Gets Realistic with Water Research

Friday, May 8th, 2009

It didn’t command headlines but an important piece of legislation passed recently that involves water research.
The House of Representatives on April 23 passed H.R. 1145, the National Water Research and Development Initiative Act of 2009. It’s designed to coordinate national research-and-development efforts regarding water use, supply and demand.
The problem is Americans are drinking a lot of tapwater containing trace quantities of prescription drugs and other complex chemical compounds. Currently there is no long-term plan to address this issue and what level of drugs pose health concerns to the public. In line with investigating that problem, it’s also important to study how these compounds can be removed from our drinking-water sources.

The act basically calls for federal research on the on the impact of trace amounts of pharmaceuticals and consumer products in treated drinking water.
One goal of the act is to get the president to establish a National Water Initiative Coordination Office to provide technical and administrative support. What’s more, the act is expected to help facilitate technology transfer, communication and opportunities for information exchange with various parties through this National Water Initiative Coordination Office.
It’s not a big step but it takes baby steps to get priorities for a crisis in water management and quality set into motion. Let’s hope this will help spur further investment water research. –Lee Bruno

Bioethanol: Regional Scourge

Friday, April 17th, 2009

Researchers at the University of Minnesota reported recently that the production of ethanol fuelstocks may consume as much as three times more water than previously thought, depending on where they’re grown.
They found that ethanol fuelstock grown in Iowa uses the least water — about 6 gallons of water for each gallon of ethanol. While fuelstock grown in Minnesota uses about 19 gallons of water per gallon of ethanol.
And that’s just on the farm. The researchers found that total water use in the production of a single gallon of ethanol is up to 2,100 gallons of water — from farm to fuel pump — depending on the regional irrigation practice in growing corn. Although a dozen states in the Corn Belt consume less than 100 gallons of water per gallon of ethanol, making them better-suited for ethanol production.
Annual bioethanol production in the U.S. is about 9 billion gallons, according to the University of Minnesota researchers, who published their findings in an article titled “Water Embodied in Bioethanol in the United States” in the April 15 issue of the American Chemical Society’s journal.

Previous studies estimated that a gallon of corn-based bioethanol requires 263 gallons to 784 gallons of water from the farm to the fuel pump. Trouble was, those estimates were calculated without considering regional irrigation practices.
No doubt water usage needs to be weighed in policy discussions involving the location of ethanol plants. If not, there’s a good chance we’ll see ethanol plants about as sensible as an ice factory in the Mojave Desert. It’s important for policymakers to scratch from their lists those regions that have high water-usage ratios. Let’s instead steer them to places like Idaho, to encourage a smarter and more sustainable approach to biofuels. By Lee Bruno

Removing Toxic Metals from Water

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

The U.S. water market is $95 billion ($425 billion globally). Of that $95 billion, $24 billion is spent on industrial wastewater purification and recovery.

Innovative water technology startup Crystal Clear Technologies has developed a novel approach to separate out toxic contaminants such as arsenic, copper, uranium and selenium. The technology is specifically relevant to industrial smelters, power plants and mining operations.

“We’re the first company doing this kind of approach,” says James Harris, CEO of Crystal Clear Technologies.

The company uses a low-cost biopolymer with absorbents called Chitosan to separate out contaminants. It works as a sponge that binds to specific toxic elements. At the core of the Menlo Park, Calif.-based company’s technology is bifunctional ligands, which bind to toxic metals on the order of eight times more effectively than existing reverse-osmosis systems.

Alberta has over 1.0 trillion barrels of oil reserves,
only recoverable with massive amounts of water.
(Photo: NASA)

The original technology was developed at the University of Oregon. Crystal Clear has used a variety of Small Business Innovation Research Grants funds over the past several years to refine and perfect the technology.

Today two methods are used to filter out unwanted contaminants: flocculation and reverse osmosis. The predominant approach today is RO. But it typically has greater energy costs and there’s a disposal problem, with residue left over. Crystal Clear’s technology has a much smaller byproduct of sludge by comparison to flocculation and RO.

In terms of cost, here’s how the technologies stack up. Flocculation costs about $.80 per 1,000 gallons of water and reverse osmosis costs $.58 per 1,000 gallons, according to data from Crystal Clear. The company’s approach with Chitosan costs $.03 to $0.15 per 1,000 gallons.

Some mining operations using RO run at $150 per 1,000 liters. Crystal Clear claims it can deliver the same purification at $25 per 1,000 liters. Over the next six to nine months, Harris says the company is going to be focusing on scaling its system and experimenting with other elements like lead and selenium.

In terms of how the filtration system can be paired with renewable energy sources like solar or wind, Harris says any of those systems could be used to drive the pumps and filtration process. The company is in the process of a fundraising round for the next phase of its operations. By Lee Bruno

Revolutionary Water Sensors

Friday, March 27th, 2009

A global water crisis is expected by 2025 unless economically viable ways of purifying water can be developed.

One of the major threats to water supplies is contamination, from saltwater from industrial waste, from pesticides.

New sensors would help. Research labs are working on sensors specially designed to deal with monitoring and purification problems.

Researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign have synthesized DNA to detect trace amounts of lead, mercury, arsenic and other contaminants in water. The DNA sensors can be produced in the form of sophisticated testing instruments suitable for metropolitan water districts or in the form of strips — like a home pregnancy test — for households and other direct-source water users.
post resumes below image


The Water Cycle
(Photo: USGS)

And once you know your water is bad, what do you do about it? Urbana-Champaign is helping there as well. Mark Shannon, director of the Center of Advanced Materials for Purification of Water with Systems at the university, and his team have synthesized chemically activated fibers and granules of carbon to remove heavy metals and pesticides like atrazine.

Hudson River Project
A recent report from IBM called Water: A Global Innovation Outlook Report says there is a severe lack of data on water even in the world’s capital.

The report cites the Hudson River, one of the most dynamic and diverse bodies of water in the world. It courses 315 miles from the Adirondacks to the western shoreline of Manhattan. It’s used for drinking, heavy industry, fishing, navigation and recreation. And its watershed is home to 5 percent of the people in the U.S.

But study of this vital river system has been limited. That’s a problem. “If you’re trying to manage a system that’s changing dynamically you need to work with data that is equally dynamic,” says John Cronin, director of the Beacon Institute for Rivers and Estuaries. “You need to be able to monitor and observe the system in real time.”

To that end, the Beacon Institute is working with IBM to develop the River and Estuary Observation Network, a system of sensors and observation platforms that will feed a constant stream of data to scientists and analysts. REON will measure and monitor chemical, biological and physical data throughout the Hudson ecosystem using a combination of floating platforms, submerged buoys, even semiautonomous underwater robots.

The goal is to understand the river in real time and how it responds to everything from storms to droughts to humans. With that information, a new level of ecomanagement could be done. And that would be one small step in putting sensor technology to work in ways that will help society and businesses better understand the long-term challenges and benefits of managing the Hudson — and water everywhere. –Lee Bruno

Nano Coatings Stem Water-Pipe Clogs

Friday, March 20th, 2009

Researchers at Duke University have come to respect the power of nano-engineered buckyballs.

In one project, the engineers found that ultrafine mesh coatings made of carbon buckyballs can hinder the ability of bacteria and other microorganisms to colonize the membranes that filter impurities from water. This is one of the major problems - and costs - in treating H2O.

The bacteria builds up and attracts other organic matter. In time, a film of biological material accumulates. A reduction in membrane-replacement cost, even of 50 percent, would translate to huge savings.

“Biofouling is viewed as one of the biggest costs associated with membrane-based water-treatment systems,” said Claudia Gunsch, assistant professor of civil engineering at Duke’s Pratt School of Engineering and senior member of the research team.

A buckyball is one shape within the family of nano-carbon shapes known as fullerenes. They’re both named after Richard Buckminster Fuller, the inventor of the geodesic dome, because their shapes resemble his famous structure.

When water-filtering membranes are treated with buckyballs, the researchers discovered that only a very small number of bacteria (20 units) are able to colonize on the surface material.

The Duke researchers plan to study other species of bacteria that would be encountered in the same kind of water treatment environments. And they plan to scale their system to simulate application in a full-scale treatment plant.

“Just as plaque can build up inside arteries and reduce the flow of blood, bacteria and other microorganisms can over time attach and accumulate on water treatment membranes and along water pipes,” said So-Ryong Chae, post-doctoral fellow in Duke’s environmental and civil engineering department in a release. Experimental results were published March 5, 2009 in the Journal of Membrane Sciences.

In a separate research effort, scientists at the University of Leeds are working on a way to use bacteria to help clean foul water.

Harmful chromium compounds are commonly found in groundwater at sites receiving waste from former textile factories, smelters and tanneries. This wastewater has been linked to cancer.

Dr. Doug Stewart heads the research team from the school of civil engineering and has discovered that adding dilute acetic acid (vinegar) can stimulate bacteria strains capable of converting chromium into a harmless substance.

Researchers plan to further study the bacteria and conditions under which it can operate. This environmentally sensitive approach to cleanup should be welcome. But we’ll have to wait a few years to see if these systems become widespread. –Lee Bruno

Hydropower from Old Washing Machines

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

OK. It’s New Zealand, not Australia. But this company called EcoInnovation still reminds you a little bit of Road Warrior. Founder and chief engineer Michael Lawley has built his “renewable energy store” on the ingenious redeployment of everyday household appliances.

Among other things, the company recycles SmartDrive motors from salvaged washing machines to generate hydropower. Of course, you need to be near a river or stream.

Yes, micro-hydro turbines that can tap into the movement of medium flowing streams and turn a turbine that can deliver most of the electrical requirements of a small home.

Lawley says the company has been able to recycle the motors from salvaged domestic washing machines - aka Whirlpool. The company claims its already made 1,000 successful installations of its micro-hydro device as well as wind and solar power systems.

EcoInnovation also prides itself on using recycled materials and renewable energy to manufacture renewable energy products.

But if you are, Lawley promises great results. He says his own home and company have been “power-bill free” for 11 years. It’s about time to put Kiwi innovation to work for U.S. homes bordering streams and rivers.

Micro hydropower systems have also gained greater attention recently in other parts of the world like Canada, India and Norway. Researchers at Dalhousie University in  Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. published a paper in the journal  Energy Sources last year. The paper pointed out that 85 percent of Nepalese people live in remote areas with limited access to energy sources, such as wood and other biomass products. The researchers found that micro hydropower has great applicability as a sustainable energy technology, especially in consideration of the socioeconomic conditions of the country.  

In fact, the paper outlined the benefits of micro hydro operations in remote areas offering one of the most feasible options for energy development. It is demonstrated that micro-hydropower can bring energy services to the rural areas of the country as well as social changes through decentralization and community participation. The researchers reported in their finding that micro-hydro projects fulfil the technological, environmental, economic, and social sustainability criteria.

And just last week, Norway’s minister of Petroleum and Energy Terje Riis-Johansen commented on micro hydropower stations as offering a way to boost the country’s electrical capacity to 18 TWh of new power. He said the country hopes that 100 applications can be processed each year. Last year, 42 power stations with a total production of 0.5 TWh received concessions. Lee Bruno

 



Bacteria-Powered Recovery of Toxic Metals

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

Selenium is a potent environmental contaminant produced by oil refineries and chemical plants. Removing it from industrial wastewater takes time and money. To date, the process has involved a chemical process that employs catalytic reduction to convert selenium to an inert form.

Japanese researchers from Osaka University and Shibaura Institute of Technology have now developed a new way to use a strain of bacteria to recover selenium in wastewater. The researchers’ novel approach uses a bioreactor. In the reactor, the conversion of toxic selenium to a nontoxic form takes about 50 hours.

Once the recovery process is completed, the resulting waste sludge is burnable ash instead of water-laden sludge, which is costly to remove and dispose. Another benefit: the process permits recovery of Se, which has gone up in price from $2.01 per pound in 1996 to $47.4 per pound in 2005.

Researchers Satoshi Soda of Osaka University and Mitsuo Yamashita of Shibaura Institute of Technology have a developed a pilot plant reactor with Shinko Chemical in Japan that was completed last year. It has two bioreactor vessels and is able to process 400 liters of sludge at a time and 0.2 million gallons in a year. The researchers have plans to build larger systems for testing and validation. Researchers recently presented their findings at the Japanese University Network in the Bay Area (JUNBA) 2009 symposium in San Francisco.–Lee Bruno

Material Elixir for Oily Water

Monday, December 29th, 2008

Oil and water do mix - all too often. And they’re not so easy to separate. Just ask the research scientists trying to develop next-generation water-filtration technologies to do it.
But with the 21st century toolsets of nanotech and chemistry, they promise to overcome vexing problems of cost-effectively removing oil agents from drinking water.
Researchers at Purdue University have developed a new, durable membrane material that does double duty: it separates oil from water (at a 98 percent rate) and cleans itself to prevent clogs.

Those kinds of purification numbers and characteristics offer a unique filtration material well suited for environmental cleanup, water purification and industrial applications.

The material is a modified polyethylene glycol. Water molecules are attracted to it and when they pass through, the oil molecules get trapped.

But the oil doesn’t stick and can later be skimmed off in a self-cleaning flush, making for longer life. The Purdue researchers also say the same technology could be used to create antifogging goggles and self-cleaning eyeglasses by not allowing water to form beads on surfaces.

A new way to separate oil and water.
(Photo: Purdue School of
Materials Engineering
)

The material is still in the experimental stage but it could be built into an experimental cross-filtration device that does not require a lot of energy to push the water through it. This is a big shortcoming to many filtration systems today.

There is also the potential to use the technology in a gravity-fed system, which would be suitable for remote villages and rural environments without electricity.

To date, the researchers have only tested diesel or hexadecane fuel but the team has plans to test other oils such as benzene toluene zylene.

Meanwhile, an MIT research team led by chemical engineer Robert Cohen and mechanical engineer Gareth McKinley has created what it claims are the first “superoleophobic,” or oil-repellant surfaces. They used a polymer developed by the Air Force that contains large numbers of oil-repelling fluorine groups. In order to transform the material into oil resistance, the MIT researchers used lithography to pattern the polymer with overhanging microstructures. In doing so, they gave the material air pockets, which helps suspend liquids and prevent them penetrating to the surface.

The MIT material has extremely low surface energy, in fact lower than the Purdue team’s material. But Purdue’s material has shown superior performance at cleaning oil from the surface of the material.

“Our materials provide for a flat surface where water ‘sees’ a wettable surface and the oil ‘sees’ a non-wettable fluorinated surface,” said Jeff Youngblood, assistant professor of materials engineering at Purdue University. “This is pretty good because if you don’t modify the glass filters with our material, essentially all the oil goes through. If you modify it with our material, then almost none of the oil goes through.”

All of which should eventually become valuable in long-term water-infrastructure developments like the Water Infrastructure Network, which is a a coalition of locally elected officials, drinking water and wastewater service providers, state environmental and health administrators, engineers and environmentalists. The group is urging water-industry professionals to contact their representatives in Congress to push passage of a $20 billion package for water infrastructure. Lee Bruno

Biologically Inspired Repair for Leaky Water Pipes

Friday, November 14th, 2008

The drinking-water pipe network in the United States extends more than 700,000 miles — four times the length of the national highway system. Much of the infrastructure is more than 100 years old.

It is estimated by the American Water Works Association that U.S. water utilities will need to invest $250 billion over the next 30 years to replace the aging pipes, many of which leak.

That typically involves digging up streets, which is costly. Enter a new platelet technology being tested by Yorkshire Water in the UK. It was developed by a company called Brinker, which was spun off from the University of Aberdeen. (It’s estimated that about a third of London’s drinking water is lost through leaking pipes.)

The technology is already used by the natural gas and oil industries to plug holes in leaky water pipes used to increase the pressure for extraction. Brinker says the technology’s parameters are: pressures from 2 to over 500 bars; and holes in pipes from 0.3mm to 50mm in diameter. The company says holes that big have been successfully sealed.

The platelet technology works the same way blood platelets seal a bleeding wound. They work under pressure, traveling inside a water pipe to seal the leak from within. 

The platelets are composed of materials that have passed stringent tests to ensure they don’t pose a risk to people who drink them. Testing is currently underway and the expectation is to have the technology in widespread commercial use in 2010.

What’s the spending outlook this year and next for water technologies like Brinker’s? A recent survey conducted by Changewave Research revealed the recession is weighing heavily on projected spending for water projects.

Desalination technology purchases are expected to be down by nearly 33 percent over the next 12 months, while long-term investment in infrastructure repair and replacement for pipes is holding steady or expected to attract more spending than any other water category over the next two years.

What’s more, wastewater treatment and water filtration are expected to get a bump in spending from the residual effect of water-infrastructure spending. Changewave Research’s  survey also found that the company best positioned to benefit in the water industry is General Electric.

With the expected steady investment in water-pipe replacement and repair infrastructure, the upside of Brinker’s platelet technology looks promising for a lot of leaky municipal water systems.

Another interesting water technology comes from Tongji University in Shanghai where researchers worked with Wei-xian Zhang, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Lehigh University and recently completed a multiyear project studying how iron can be used to detoxify pollutants in industrial wastewater.
The iron, called zero valent iron because it is not oxidized, was obtained in the form of shavings or turnings from local metal-processing shops for less than 15 cents a pound.

Following a pilot test of the iron-detox approach two years ago, the Shanghai government approved a grant to construct a full-scale treatment reactor in the Taopu district.  It can process almost 16 million gallons a day of wastewater. Prior to the experiment, few people believed scrap iron could be used to clean water. –Lee Bruno