Send an E-Card From
EcoWorld's Nature Gallery
(See all Comments)
by John Kirker on 07/04/09
I am a global warming
skeptic. Unfortunately, it
seems to me there are f...
by Hundreds of... on 07/03/09
[...] Richard Lindzen,
professor of meteorology and
atmospheric physic...
by Setting the... on 07/03/09
[...]
 http://www.ecoworld.com/features/2004/03/06/vandana-shiva-in-her-own-words/ Vandana
Shiva - In Her Own Words ...
by D. S. Solanki on 07/03/09
Hi Dear, I want to Marketing
job in solar PV systems
& install sol...
by S.O'Donnell on 07/02/09
I live in a suburban new
york community where any
morning one can see fifte...
by gogi virdi on 07/02/09
Excellent Article !!! This
is what we need---- India
needs....keeping the gre...
by my blog on 07/02/09
check this out... this is
mine...
(See all Comments)
EcoWorld Commentary
Ed Ring,
Editor-in-Chief
Daniela Muhawi,
Editor-at-Large
Contributing Editors
(comments are welcome)

Maps & Information






Today is Saturday July 04, 2009
Editor's Commentary

Skyonic’s CO2 into Solids

Posted on: February 28th, 2008 by Ed Ring

What would it take to turn CO2 gas into a carbonate solid?  According to Mark Clayton, VP of Corporate Relations for Austin based Skyonic, the process could be commercially viable in a few years.

What if fossil fuel had zero emissions?
(Photo: Skyonic)

“Our rough numbers show that with the costs of the chemicals we use and the value of the byproducts, chlorine and hydrogen, the process can almost pay for itself financially,” said Clayton. 

Apparently officials at Luminant, one of the biggest power generators in the United States, are in agreement, since they have invested in Skyonic and are working with them to build a demonstration plant.  “We want a full scale design by the end of 2008, so we can break ground in 2009 and be operating two years after that,” said Clayton.

According to the EIA, the USA produces about 240 gigawatt-years of power from coal each year; just a little over 50% of all electric power in the USA comes from coal fired power plants.  To do this, we mine about 1.1 billion tons of coal each year, and coal fired power plants release about 2.3 billion tons of CO2 emissions each year.  So what would happen if 100% of these emissions were turned into sodium bicarbonate using Skyonic’s technology?

As it turns out, the process would require massive inputs of salt - which is a cheap and abundant material - and applying Skyonic’s process would exchange 2.3 billion tons of CO2 emissions for about 3.2 billion tons of sodium bicarbonate.  As we note in our post “Plasco’s Waste to Energy,” as well as “Ze-gen’s Waste to Energy,” all municipal solid waste in the USA each year only totals 220 million tons, and all construction debris only adds another 100 million tons.  For that matter, as we report in “Astec’s Green Asphalt,” the total volume of rock quarried in the USA each year is only about 3.0 billion tons - a staggering amount - but less than the volume of sodium bicarbonate we would produce if we converted 100% of these CO2 emissions from coal into a solid.

On the other hand, coal plants are becoming more efficient every day, there are other ways to utilize the CO2 - such as to nourish factory farmed algae for biofuel, and we probably aren’t going to eliminate 100% of these emissions right away, anyway.  As Clayton pointed out, sodium bicarbonate is a fairly innocuous, non-toxic material, and there is capacity inside the coal mines to refill them with the carbonate waste to replace the coal that was removed.  There may be other uses for the carbonate - Clayton noted there may be potential to use carbonate in cement, for example.

And as always, there are other technologies to scrub CO2 from coal fired power plant emissions - yet another scheme was reported today by Cleantech.com in their report “Carbon capture gets crystal powered.”

What is potentially most interesting about Skyonic’s technology is that it may have a relatively low cost - Clayton stated this process may actually be economically viable even without dependance on CO2 offset funding.  In any case, capturing CO2 as a solid may be more sustainable than attempting to pressurize every underground cavern ever found.  Like many solutions to environmental challenges, conversion of CO2 emissions into inert solid matter may be one of an assortment of remedies that in combination provide a comprehensive solution.

Email / Share:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Next »

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 28th, 2008 at 11:13 pm and is filed under Climate, Electricity, Energy, Fossil Fuel. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Tags: , , ,

5 Responses to “Skyonic’s CO2 into Solids”

  1. 1. George Antrobus Says:

    Not only is the disposition of such a huge amount of baking soda problematic, where will they get all the salt? Maybe desalination brine? We will see if Skyonics can actually deliver on this. And you are correct this could better make sense if it were part of a variety of solutions - efficiency improvements at the top of the list.

  2. 2. Phil Jamison Says:

    How much salt is required?

  3. 3. Hari Aparajith Says:

    I am chemical engineer and I did some calculations based on their reactions. Here are the results

    To treat carbon emission from a 500 MW plant, you need roughly 3.2 million tons of sodium hydroxide. For producing each ton of sodium hydroxide you need 2.4 MWh of electricity (Diaphragm process).Total electricity needed to produce sodium hydroxide is much more than the power plant produce. (Trust me…i checked my calculations million times) Then you have to transport and handle 6.7 million tons of baking soda. (150,000 truck loads)

    it took me 10 min to do these calculations. I cant believe this guy started a company without considering any of these. The worst thing is he even found a sponsor who gave him millions of dollars to try this out.

  4. 4. Mark Rego-Monteiro Says:

    Welcome to the wonderful world of whole cost accounting. Too much mining and transport, and chlorine gas? Then maybe the technology won’t get too far. Nevertheless, the employees and overpaid management ensure that coal burning won’t stop anytime soon. After all, how much effort does it take to extract coal, and petroleum, not to mention loads of other extracted materials?

    If we capture CO2, then the 2.4 MW for sodium hydroxide makes sense, for example, as would desalination of seawater. Chlorine then needs to be contained usefully.

    That’s also where the diversity of another technology like GreenFuel Technology’s algae greenhouse to biofuel works, then great. Or maybe we can capture CO2 emissions for drinking soda manufacturers. Problems are not prohibitions in this kind of situation. They are opportunities.

  5. 5. Hari Aparajith Says:

    To add to my comment above, the process will emit 2.2 tons of CO2 for every ton of CO2 it fixes. I am mind-blown to see how he got this much funding for this.

Leave a Comment

Treelink.org
Sustainable Land Development Today
AUTO SHIPPING
New Hybrid Cars
Toyota Prius
Cheap Gas Prices
Latest Hybrid Cars
Finca Leola

Archives

April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (5)
February 2009 (4)
January 2009 (5)
December 2008 (6)
November 2008 (8)
October 2008 (11)
September 2008 (11)
August 2008 (6)
July 2008 (10)
June 2008 (7)
May 2008 (12)
2009 (18)
2008 (127)
2007 (127)
2006 (102)

Links

Affordable Housing Design
Alternative Energy Blog
Alternative Energy Stocks
Alternative Energy Today
AlwaysOn - High Tech & Green Tech
American Dream Coalition
American Institute of Architects
AutoblogGreen
Big Biofuels Blog
BIOconversion Blog
Biofuel Review
BlueVoice.org
Camino Energy
Cato Institute
Clean Edge
Cleantech Blog
Climate Science
CNET Greentech
Congress for the New Urbanism
earth2tech
Edmunds Green Car Advisor
Electric Power Research Institute
ENF Photovoltaic Directory
Environmental Republican
ESRI Conservation Program
EV World
Evangelical Ecologist
Green Business
Green Car Congress
Green Car Guide
GreenBiz
Greencar.com
Greenpeace Blog
Gristmill
Hybrid Car Blog
ICIS Biofuels Blog
International Atomic Energy Agency
International Energy Agency
International Solar Energy Society
Living Lands & Waters
Money Morning
Mongabay.com
National Biodiesel Board
National Hydropower Association
National Renewable Energy Lab
New Urban News
Oilgae.com
Pension Tsunami
Rainforest Action Network
RealClimate.org
Renewable Energy Stocks
Rocky Mountain Institute
SeaWatch.org
SeaWeb.org
Sierra Club Compass Blog
Society for Ecological Restoration
Solar Energy Industries Association
SolarBuzz.com
The Antiplanner
The Cryosphere Today
The Energy Blog
The Green Car Website
The Reason Foundation
The Wildlands Project
Treehugger
Trees Water People
U.S. Green Building Council
UN Food & Agricultural Organization
Urban Land Institute
Urban Planning Blog
US Dept. of Energy
US Environmental Protection Agency
WildAid
World Coal Institute
World Nuclear Association
World Resources Institute
World Wildlife Fund