Send an E-Card From
EcoWorld's Nature Gallery
(See all Comments)
by John Kirker on 07/04/09
I am a global warming
skeptic. Unfortunately, it
seems to me there are f...
by Hundreds of... on 07/03/09
[...] Richard Lindzen,
professor of meteorology and
atmospheric physic...
by Setting the... on 07/03/09
[...]
 http://www.ecoworld.com/features/2004/03/06/vandana-shiva-in-her-own-words/ Vandana
Shiva - In Her Own Words ...
by D. S. Solanki on 07/03/09
Hi Dear, I want to Marketing
job in solar PV systems
& install sol...
by S.O'Donnell on 07/02/09
I live in a suburban new
york community where any
morning one can see fifte...
by gogi virdi on 07/02/09
Excellent Article !!! This
is what we need---- India
needs....keeping the gre...
by my blog on 07/02/09
check this out... this is
mine...
(See all Comments)
EcoWorld Commentary
Ed Ring,
Editor-in-Chief
Daniela Muhawi,
Editor-at-Large
Contributing Editors
(comments are welcome)

Maps & Information






Today is Saturday July 04, 2009
Editor's Commentary

Solar Integrated BIPVs

Posted on: February 11th, 2008 by Ed Ring

That they are pioneers in ”BIPV” technology (building integrated photovoltaics) makes Los Angeles based Solar Integrated a very interesting company.  But what makes Solar Integrated really, really interesting is they very likely have the most inexpensive photovoltaic solution in the world today.

Solar Integrated’s flexible PV
panels being installed on the
CocaCola plant in Los Angeles.

Large scale photovoltaic installations are still very expensive.  Even when you get up into the 500 kilowatt or 1.0 megawatt range, which spreads the “balance of plant” costs (the inverter, the power management system, the utility interties) over a higher quantity of photovoltaic panels, you are still looking at a total cost of around $7.00 to $8.00 per watt.  Solar Integrated can beat these prices, and the reason is because they have come up with some of the first commercially available flexible thin-film photovoltaic panels.

Solar Integrated takes flexible amorphous silicon solar panels, supplied by Uni-Solar, and laminates them onto a flexible PVC roofing membrane.  Their standard 9′ by 19′ foot panel delivers 816 watts in full sun, which equates to 4.8 watts per square foot.  They also offer a standard 9′ x 19′ panel that delivers 864 watts; 5.0 watts per square foot.

Amorphous silicon, however, delivers output in overcast conditions or in conditions when the sun is low in the sky.  Crystalline photovoltaics don’t share this characteristic, which means their efficiency advantages over amorphous photovoltaics is overstated unless this is taken into account.  In Los Angeles, for example, there are 5.0 ”full sun equivalent” hours of sunlight per day.  But because amorphous silicon photovoltaics can absorb light in multiple spectra, they produce energy when there is less sunlight, and can stretch these 5.0 hours by about 20%.  This translates directly into more watt-hours per square foot of PV, which in-turn translates directly into lower costs.

The reason Solar Integrated’s installation costs are probably the most competitive in the USA is because installation costs - the cost for skilled electricians and roofers - are now the largest portion of the installed cost of most photovoltaic systems.  If state-of-the-art manufacturing costs of PVs are crossing below $1.00 per watt, and they are, there really isn’t much left to squeeze out of overall costs for PVs through technological advancements in their manufacture.  But with installation costs in the industry averaging $5.00 per watt (the margin on PVs and balance-of-plant comprising the rest), it is crucial to bring installation costs down for the price of kilowatt-hours from PVs to attain grid parity.  Solar Integrated’s flexible solar panels, which only weigh 12 ounces per square foot and can literally be unrolled onto rooftops, are extremely time-efficient to install.  From an economic perspective, this innovation is a breakthrough as significant as anything that happens in the world of PV fabrication.

Randall Corey, Solar Integrated’s VP of Construction Operations said one of the primary reasons they have been able to get their installation costs so low was because the product was designed by roofers in the first place.  As he put it, “The background of our people in roofing is one of our strengths, because with their help we developed a product where the integration of the photovoltaics into the building doesn’t compromise the roofing solution at all.”

Solar Integrated’s new factory has an output of 24 megawatts per year, and their installed base at this point is over 17 megawatts.  Their 2.0 megawatt system at the Tesco Group building in Riverside, California, is the biggest building integrated photovoltaic system in the world to-date.

Solar Integrated has been a public company since 2001 and is traded (SIT) on the AIM market on the London Stock Exchange.  They have 250 employees and revenues in 2006 were US$ 38M.  While their 2007 revenues haven’t been announced, they experienced year over year growth of about 100%.  How low can they get the cost of a large photovoltaic install?  Give them a call.

Email / Share:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Next »

This entry was posted on Monday, February 11th, 2008 at 11:11 pm and is filed under Buildings, Electricity, Energy, Photovoltaic, Solar. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Tags: , , ,

One Response to “Solar Integrated BIPVs”

  1. 1. Green Man Says:

    Wait! You say that state-of-the-art manufacturing costs of PVs are crossing below $1.00 per watt. So then SIT is not using state-of-the art! Because Uni-Solar manufacturing costs are $2.57 per Watt (according to the presentations on ECD’s web page)

Leave a Comment

Tree Bank
AUTO SHIPPING
New Hybrid Cars
Toyota Prius
Cheap Gas Prices
Latest Hybrid Cars
Finca Leola

Archives

April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (5)
February 2009 (4)
January 2009 (5)
December 2008 (6)
November 2008 (8)
October 2008 (11)
September 2008 (11)
August 2008 (6)
July 2008 (10)
June 2008 (7)
May 2008 (12)
2009 (18)
2008 (127)
2007 (127)
2006 (102)

Links

Affordable Housing Design
Alternative Energy Blog
Alternative Energy Stocks
Alternative Energy Today
AlwaysOn - High Tech & Green Tech
American Dream Coalition
American Institute of Architects
AutoblogGreen
Big Biofuels Blog
BIOconversion Blog
Biofuel Review
BlueVoice.org
Camino Energy
Cato Institute
Clean Edge
Cleantech Blog
Climate Science
CNET Greentech
Congress for the New Urbanism
earth2tech
Edmunds Green Car Advisor
Electric Power Research Institute
ENF Photovoltaic Directory
Environmental Republican
ESRI Conservation Program
EV World
Evangelical Ecologist
Green Business
Green Car Congress
Green Car Guide
GreenBiz
Greencar.com
Greenpeace Blog
Gristmill
Hybrid Car Blog
ICIS Biofuels Blog
International Atomic Energy Agency
International Energy Agency
International Solar Energy Society
Living Lands & Waters
Money Morning
Mongabay.com
National Biodiesel Board
National Hydropower Association
National Renewable Energy Lab
New Urban News
Oilgae.com
Pension Tsunami
Rainforest Action Network
RealClimate.org
Renewable Energy Stocks
Rocky Mountain Institute
SeaWatch.org
SeaWeb.org
Sierra Club Compass Blog
Society for Ecological Restoration
Solar Energy Industries Association
SolarBuzz.com
The Antiplanner
The Cryosphere Today
The Energy Blog
The Green Car Website
The Reason Foundation
The Wildlands Project
Treehugger
Trees Water People
U.S. Green Building Council
UN Food & Agricultural Organization
Urban Land Institute
Urban Planning Blog
US Dept. of Energy
US Environmental Protection Agency
WildAid
World Coal Institute
World Nuclear Association
World Resources Institute
World Wildlife Fund