<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Affordable Desalination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2008/01/03/affordable-desalination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2008/01/03/affordable-desalination/</link>
	<description>Ed Ring's EcoWorld Posts</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  5 Jul 2009 03:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Torben Revald</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2008/01/03/affordable-desalination/comment-page-1/#comment-96846</link>
		<dc:creator>Torben Revald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2008/01/03/affordable-desalination/#comment-96846</guid>
		<description>We see a potential for many more small, 'greener' desalination plants in the years to come.  if you live beyond the piped water coverage youl'll want a safe, reliable and sustainable water supply at reasonable cost.  Therefore, we have started producing such a system.  In addition to the high quality steel components the energy consumption is ultra-low, i.e. 0.8 kW. Based on energy costs of $ 0.2 per kWh you can produce drinking water at $2.7 per 1000 gallons - not bad !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We see a potential for many more small, &#8216;greener&#8217; desalination plants in the years to come.  if you live beyond the piped water coverage youl&#8217;ll want a safe, reliable and sustainable water supply at reasonable cost.  Therefore, we have started producing such a system.  In addition to the high quality steel components the energy consumption is ultra-low, i.e. 0.8 kW. Based on energy costs of $ 0.2 per kWh you can produce drinking water at $2.7 per 1000 gallons - not bad !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barrie harrop</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2008/01/03/affordable-desalination/comment-page-1/#comment-91872</link>
		<dc:creator>barrie harrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2008/01/03/affordable-desalination/#comment-91872</guid>
		<description>try www.windesal.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try <a href="http://www.windesal.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.windesal.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Anderton</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2008/01/03/affordable-desalination/comment-page-1/#comment-90237</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Anderton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2008/01/03/affordable-desalination/#comment-90237</guid>
		<description>It's good that cheaper systems for desalination are starting to arise. Problem of scarcity of  potable drinking water will surely worsen in a few years to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good that cheaper systems for desalination are starting to arise. Problem of scarcity of  potable drinking water will surely worsen in a few years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
