Home  -  Articles  -  Forums  -  Blog  -  Billboard  -  Projects  -  Newsletters  -  EcoWorld.org  -  Register!  -  About EcoWorld
Air  -  Water  -  Earth  -  Plants  -  Trees  -  Animals  -  People  -  Energy & Technology  -  Goods  -  Funds  -  Media  -  Tours

Join EcoWorld
REGISTER with EcoWorld, and help us build the Global Environmental Community

Recent Commentary
Optisolar’s Thin Film
Utility Electricity Storage
Enviromentalist Priorities
Mangroves Stop Tsunami
Bright Source’s Power Tower
Polaris Venture’s Bob Metcalf
Fossil Fuel Reality
Affordable Green Homes
Novel Thermal Storage
Volvo’s Future Car
Miles Electric Vehicles
ESS Compliance Software
Financing Photovoltaics
Trees, Water & Climate
Antarctica’s Ice Mass
GM’s Volt on track for 2010
Unions - Ideals vs. Reality
Strategic Green
Venrock’s Matt Trevithick
Aquabirds & Aquabuoys
Revisiting Biofuel
Greens and James Inhofe
100% EVs vs. Series Hybrids
Rational Environmentalism
Farallon’s Fur Seals
E-Cards
Send an
Electronic
Postcard
EcoWorld Tours
EcoWorld '05 EcoTour Survey
OneWorld Journeys
EcoWorld Forums
Biofuel Forum
Electricity Forum
Reforesting Forum
EcoWorld Feature Articles
Optimizing Biofuel
China's Eco-Crisis
India's Hydro Power
French Nuclear Debate
Markets Solve Scarcity
India's Water Consciousness
EcoWorld EV Gallery
Free Market Greens
Biofuel's Mixed Blessings
Reforesting the Tropics
China's Energy Demand
India's Solar Power
Our Endangered Oceans
India's Green Future
Global Warming Priorities
CO2 Taxes
China's Renewable Energy
Biofuel Bonanza
Inconvenient Truth Rebuttal
Reforesting the World
Inconvenient Skeptics
Solar Energy in Egypt
Saving Wild Species
Factory Farmed Biofuel
Global Warming Facts
Electrifying Central Asia
India's Nuclear Power
Climate Catastrophe?
Bioethanol vs. Biodiesel
Asia's Embattled Tigers
Factory Hog Farming
China's Wind Power
Ethanol in Africa
Biodynamic Farming
Global Warming
Growing Biofuel
India's Biodiesel Scene
Saving Giant Sea Turtles
India's Water Future
Clean Coal Technology
Central American Biocorridors
Arctic Rivers Save Aral Sea
Profitable Reforestation
Earth Projects
Arctic to Aral
India's Rishi Valley
Mesoamerican Biocorridor
Clean the Ganges
Refill the Aral Sea
Deforesting to Reforesting
more Projects . . .
Maps & Information
Countries - Watersheds
EcoRegions

Knowledge is Power!
Support EcoWorld
Buy Books Here
(Amazon Affiliate)

The Hydrogen Economy:
The Creation of the
Worldwide Energy Web
and the Redistribution
of Power on Earth

Blue Gold:
The Fight to Stop
the Corporate Theft
of the World's Water
Today is May 21, 2008
Editor's Commentary

Revisiting Desalinization

Much of the water in Southern California comes from the north, and to get into the Los Angeles basin must be pumped over the Tehachapi Mountains.  This is the biggest water lift in the world, about 2,000 feet (ref. NRDC). 

When looking at alternatives to transporting huge quantities of water that might be better left where it is, desalinization is not getting sufficient attention.  It turns out that 2,000 feet of lift is about the point where the energy necessary to desalinate seawater is actually slightly less than the energy required to pump water over a 2,000 foot mountain.

In our features “India’s Water Future” as well as “Arctic to Aral,” we have reported on the energy requirements to pump water.  Using the same formulas, it turns out that the energy required to lift a cubic kilometer of water 2,000 feet is 248 megawatt-years.

What if that water were desalinated in plants located on the Pacific Coast, perhaps using land within Camp Pendleton between Los Angeles and San Diego?  As we reported in “Photovoltaic Desalinization,” desalinization plants able to process 1.0 cubic kilometers per year are being designed today, at an estimated cost of $2.0 billion dollars.  At an operating energy requirement of 2.0 kilowatt-hours per cubic meter, it would take 2.0 billion kilowatt-hours to desalinate one cubic kilometer of seawater.  That’s only 228 megawatt-years, LESS energy than is used to pump the same amount of water into Los Angeles from the north.

According to the Los Angeles County Dept. of Water and Power, the average residential household in LA County uses 500 gallons of water per day (ref. LADPW).  That equates to 690 cubic meters per year, which means that 1.0 cubic kilometers of water would supply nearly 1.5 million households with water - well over five million people.

For every gallon of usable water extracted from seawater, seven gallons of slightly more salinated seawater must be returned to the ocean.  The costs for a system to distribute this water in a sufficiently dispersed stream certainly wouldn’t cost more than the desalinization plant itself.  Assume a cost of $5.0 billion for a desalinization plant that would supply water to 5.0 million people.  Amortized over 50 years, this capital cost would only amount to about $20 per person per year - adjusting for present value of money, certainly no more than $50 per person per year - not much.

What water crisis?  What water shortage?

One Response to “Revisiting Desalinization”

  1. Gal Josefsberg Says:

    I wasn’t aware of the additional cost of distributing the saltier water back. How much of an impact does that water have on the environment if not dispersed? As in, what happens if you just pump it back in one location? How would you disperse that kind of volume?

    By the way, I’m for desalinization. I think it’s a great idea and something we need to build now, not when water is in short supply. I’m just curious about this aspect of the problem that I was unaware of before.

    GJ
    http://www.60in3.com

Leave a Reply


Google

Learn Much More!
Click & Buy Books
(Amazon Affiliate)
Cradle to Cradle:
Remaking the Way
We Make Things

World Encyclopedia
of Trees


Natural Capitalism:
Creating the Next
Industrial Revolution


Encyclopedia
of Mammals

Support EcoWorld!
Click & Buy Books
(Amazon Affiliate)
Copyright 1993 through 2007 EcoWorld Inc., All Rights Reserved
EcoWorld, EcoWorld Tours, and "EcoWorld - Nature & Technology in Harmony" are registered Trademarks of EcoWorld Inc.
Credits, acknowledgements, disclaimers, and how to obtain permission to reprint EcoWorld content.