Send an E-Card From
EcoWorld's Nature Gallery
(See all Comments)
by Professor As... on 07/05/09
Dear Sir Plants are also
social and have a societies
or associations which on...
by Professor As... on 07/05/09
Dear Sir Jatropha cant be
cultivated in a region below
300 mm rainfall and wou...
by Ashwani Kumar on 07/05/09
Dear Sir Please also look
for the petrocrop plants
which are important a...
by Ashwani Kumar on 07/05/09
Dear Sir Please also look
for the petrocrop plants
which are important a...
by chhavi chawla on 07/04/09
i am a student and require
to build a project proposal
on the study of t...
by Chris Mwansa on 07/04/09
What a great idea? I am
looking forward to more
information on this proje...
by dr.kalyan ba... on 07/04/09
Om sarbe bhabanti sukhin
Sarbe shantu niramaya, Sarbe
bhadrani pashenti Ma ka...
(See all Comments)
EcoWorld Commentary
Ed Ring,
Editor-in-Chief
Daniela Muhawi,
Editor-at-Large
Contributing Editors
(comments are welcome)

Maps & Information






Today is Sunday July 05, 2009
Editor's Commentary

Landfills vs. Recycling

Posted on: March 7th, 2007 by Ed Ring

It is an article of faith among environmentalists that recycling is superior to landfills as a way to process municipal waste.  But reality does not always conform to articles of faith, especially when it comes to environmentalism.  We’ve reported on this before, read “Recycling Myths.”

First of all, contrary to popular belief, there is plenty of available landfill inventory.  The US is pouring about 270 million tons per year into landfills, compared to approximately 70 million tons of waste that is being recycled each year.  And right now, if every landfill operator in the USA did nothing to increase their landfill capacity, there is enough landfill space to absorb all of America’s garbage for the next 40 years.  Many landfill operators have over 200 years of available landfill inventory.

Secondly, landfills are ultra safe.  In the 1989 “Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,” standards were set by the Federal Government that virtually preclude contaminants from landfills infiltrating aquifers or otherwise causing pollution.  Landfills today have liners of two to four feet of recompacted clay - nearly the density of concrete, on the bottom.  Above that they have a 60-100 millimeter geosynthetic liner, a hard and impermeable rubber.  Above that there is a one to two foot “drainage layer” which is comprised of pebbles and buried pipes, so any liquid that seeps downwards is immediately collected by the pipes and removed for safe processing.  Landfills are no longer sited anywhere near known seismic areas, and in any case are being constantly drained so seepage is impossible.

Here is the clincher - we are on the verge of developing technologies that will process all municipal waste before it needs to go to a landfill, or a recycling company.  This is extremely disruptive technology, since it is going to pull the rug out from what has become a multi-billion dollar, taxpayer-funded recycling industry.  An example of a company that has already established a pilot plant to extract virtually all valuable materials from unsorted municipal waste is “World Waste Technologies,” based in San Diego, California.  There are many other companies hot on the trail.

There are technologies coming soon that will use automated mechanical sorting along with thermal conversion and chemical conversion processes, and they not only will cost-effectively reduce unsorted municipal waste feedstock to valuable fuels, fertilizers, building materials and metal ingots, but these processors will run on the energy extracted from the garbage itself.  And unlike today’s conventional (and very expensive) recycling operations, these new technologies emit virtually zero pollution.

So forget about recycling, pour garbage into the far more cost-effective landfills, and give the savings back to the taxpayers.  As these new garbage processing technologies come on stream, if we like, we can then mine the garbage feedstocks previously accumulated in the landfills themselves, recycling everything stored in them en-masse.

Email / Share:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Next »

This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 7th, 2007 at 10:21 pm and is filed under CleanTech, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Landfills vs. Recycling”

  1. 1. jeff scherer Says:

    AGAIN PEOPLE ARE MISSING THE POINT THAT DOESN’T CHANGE; THAT THE EARTH EVENTUALLY RECYCLES EVERYTHING AND THAT THE GOAL IN GARBAGE IS TO CREATE MATERIALS LIKE CERAMICS, CEMENTS, AND GLASS TO BE THE PRIMARY NONTOXIC MATERIALS THAT THE BULK PARTS OF NEARLY EVERYTHING ARE MADE OF, BECAUSE THESE MATERIALS DO SEVERAL VERY BENEFICIAL THINGS. THEY FORM LANDFILLS THAT YOU CAN BUILD STABLE BUILDINGS ON THAT PEOPLE HAVE NO HEALTH HAZARDS FROM. THEY STRETCH PRECIOUS MATERIAL SO ALL THE WORLD CAN HAVE BASIC THINGS LIKE FOOD, SHELTER, SANITATION, TRANSPORTATION, HEAT, COOLING, REFRIGERATION, WATER IN ADEQUATE SUPPLIES AND LATER PLENTIFUL AMOUNTS.

    THE OTHER MATERIAL WHICH ARE STRETCHED ARE MOSTLY THE SOURCES OF POLLUTIONS NOW BECAUSE THE MAKING AND REFINNING OF THEM TO BE THE BULK STRUCTURAL PARTS OF THINGS INSTEAD OF CERAMICS, CEMENTS, AND GLASS IS THE SOURCE OF MOST POLLUTANTS CIVILIZATION CREATES. BY USING THOSE SCARCER METALS, PLASTICS… OTHER SPECIALTY MATERIALS FOR NON-STRUCTURAL PARTS OF EVERYTHING , WE CAN SHUT DOWN MOST POLLUTION TO LEVELS NATURE AND PEOPLE CAN HANDLE. WE NEED HIGH AMOUNTS OF POLLUTION FREE ENERGY TO USES THESE ANCIENT MATERIALS AGAIN. NUCLEAR ENERGY AND HYDROGEN FROM FOSSIL FUEL SOURCES WILL SHORTLY CAUSE MORE PROBLEMS THAN CAN BE HANDLED IF PURSUED FURTHER. HYDROGEN FROM SPLITTING DISTILLED WATER WITH ELECTRICITY FROM WAVE GENERATED ELECTRICITY AND SOLAR CELL WHICH ARE ABOUT TO BECOME VERY EFFICIENT (HIGH POWER ENOUGH) CAN BE DONE WITHOUT FINANCIALLY LOSSES TO OTHER ENERGY SECTOR STOCKS, BY COMBINING THOSE STOCKS INTO ONE GLOBALLY STOCK YET LET ALL THOSE COMPANIES REMAING INDEPENDENT TO FACE INDEPENDENT NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL MANDATES.

    AS MORE NATIONS BECOME CONVINCED WE HAVE DEEP ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS, THE GLOBAL WARMING AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES WILL HEAL. SINCE THE FUNDING FOR CHANGE OF EACH INDEPENDENT COMPANY OF ALL THE GLOBAL ENERGY SECTOR COMPANIES PLUS CHEMICAL COMPANIES AND FOSSIL FUEL COMPANIES IS SECURE, THESE COMPANIES CAN REPURPOSE WITHOUT LOSSES IN NEW DIRECTIONS THAT ARE NONTOXIC TO LEVELS NATURE CAN HANDLE.

Leave a Comment

Tree Bank
Sustainable Land Development Today
AUTO SHIPPING
New Hybrid Cars
Toyota Prius
Cheap Gas Prices
Latest Hybrid Cars
Finca Leola

Archives

April 2009 (4)
March 2009 (5)
February 2009 (4)
January 2009 (5)
December 2008 (6)
November 2008 (8)
October 2008 (11)
September 2008 (11)
August 2008 (6)
July 2008 (10)
June 2008 (7)
May 2008 (12)
2009 (18)
2008 (127)
2007 (127)
2006 (102)

Links

Affordable Housing Design
Alternative Energy Blog
Alternative Energy Stocks
Alternative Energy Today
AlwaysOn - High Tech & Green Tech
American Dream Coalition
American Institute of Architects
AutoblogGreen
Big Biofuels Blog
BIOconversion Blog
Biofuel Review
BlueVoice.org
Camino Energy
Cato Institute
Clean Edge
Cleantech Blog
Climate Science
CNET Greentech
Congress for the New Urbanism
earth2tech
Edmunds Green Car Advisor
Electric Power Research Institute
ENF Photovoltaic Directory
Environmental Republican
ESRI Conservation Program
EV World
Evangelical Ecologist
Green Business
Green Car Congress
Green Car Guide
GreenBiz
Greencar.com
Greenpeace Blog
Gristmill
Hybrid Car Blog
ICIS Biofuels Blog
International Atomic Energy Agency
International Energy Agency
International Solar Energy Society
Living Lands & Waters
Money Morning
Mongabay.com
National Biodiesel Board
National Hydropower Association
National Renewable Energy Lab
New Urban News
Oilgae.com
Pension Tsunami
Rainforest Action Network
RealClimate.org
Renewable Energy Stocks
Rocky Mountain Institute
SeaWatch.org
SeaWeb.org
Sierra Club Compass Blog
Society for Ecological Restoration
Solar Energy Industries Association
SolarBuzz.com
The Antiplanner
The Cryosphere Today
The Energy Blog
The Green Car Website
The Reason Foundation
The Wildlands Project
Treehugger
Trees Water People
U.S. Green Building Council
UN Food & Agricultural Organization
Urban Land Institute
Urban Planning Blog
US Dept. of Energy
US Environmental Protection Agency
WildAid
World Coal Institute
World Nuclear Association
World Resources Institute
World Wildlife Fund