<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thin Film Photovoltaics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/10/31/thin-film-photovoltaics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/10/31/thin-film-photovoltaics/</link>
	<description>Ed Ring's EcoWorld Posts</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  5 Jul 2009 04:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chi Pai(Mr)</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/10/31/thin-film-photovoltaics/comment-page-1/#comment-73127</link>
		<dc:creator>Chi Pai(Mr)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/10/31/thin-film-photovoltaics/#comment-73127</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir or madan:
I would like to compare the cost per WATT between Polysilicon and
CIGS.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir or madan:<br />
I would like to compare the cost per WATT between Polysilicon and<br />
CIGS.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Ring</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/10/31/thin-film-photovoltaics/comment-page-1/#comment-64782</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Ring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/10/31/thin-film-photovoltaics/#comment-64782</guid>
		<description>Marcus - thin film photovoltaic technology is just starting to take off.  At the same time, the traditional crystaline photovoltaic manufacturing is starting to really increase because the supply of raw polysilicon is finally increasing.  It isn't clear which technology will dominate.  Crystaline photovoltaic is, generally speaking, somewhat more expensive, but reputed to be longer lasting and higher output.  You can get anywhere between 10-25 watts per square foot of PV using crystaline.  With thin film, yields are lower, maybe 5-15 watts per square foot.  But thin film is a catch-all term to describe many manufacturing processes, and the potential of thin film isn't yet known.  In any case, since you generally have plenty of roof space - certainly in a tropical latitude - your main concern should be installed cost per watt output.  In that context efficiency isn't relevant, it only affects how much roof you cover.  Good luck and let us know how you do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcus - thin film photovoltaic technology is just starting to take off.  At the same time, the traditional crystaline photovoltaic manufacturing is starting to really increase because the supply of raw polysilicon is finally increasing.  It isn&#8217;t clear which technology will dominate.  Crystaline photovoltaic is, generally speaking, somewhat more expensive, but reputed to be longer lasting and higher output.  You can get anywhere between 10-25 watts per square foot of PV using crystaline.  With thin film, yields are lower, maybe 5-15 watts per square foot.  But thin film is a catch-all term to describe many manufacturing processes, and the potential of thin film isn&#8217;t yet known.  In any case, since you generally have plenty of roof space - certainly in a tropical latitude - your main concern should be installed cost per watt output.  In that context efficiency isn&#8217;t relevant, it only affects how much roof you cover.  Good luck and let us know how you do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/10/31/thin-film-photovoltaics/comment-page-1/#comment-64781</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/10/31/thin-film-photovoltaics/#comment-64781</guid>
		<description>My big question, as I am not as informed in this field as I would like to be, is what is the out put of these thin filmed PV's?

In my country, The Bahamas, the masses are holding on to archaic forms of energy when we have so much sun year round. As an architect its a no brainer and I need information to push the public in that direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My big question, as I am not as informed in this field as I would like to be, is what is the out put of these thin filmed PV&#8217;s?</p>
<p>In my country, The Bahamas, the masses are holding on to archaic forms of energy when we have so much sun year round. As an architect its a no brainer and I need information to push the public in that direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris de vuyst</title>
		<link>http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/10/31/thin-film-photovoltaics/comment-page-1/#comment-15561</link>
		<dc:creator>chris de vuyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 11:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecoworld.com/blog/2006/10/31/thin-film-photovoltaics/#comment-15561</guid>
		<description>hello,

i am trying to follow as good if possible the thin film solar energy market, and i am very pleased with your article for an overview at this time. But may ask why you aren't telling a thing about xsunx ... I believe this company will also be able to become a player!

thanks for your feed back
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello,</p>
<p>i am trying to follow as good if possible the thin film solar energy market, and i am very pleased with your article for an overview at this time. But may ask why you aren&#8217;t telling a thing about xsunx &#8230; I believe this company will also be able to become a player!</p>
<p>thanks for your feed back<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
